@thechelsukprofilefollowCurrently in remission from ME/CFS after 3+ years. Occasional software engineering leader, app developer, blogger, zwifter, and just being online.wrote:
Any conversation
coping with fictional characters has done irreversible damage to me. it is embarrassing to cry over these characters
@glitterbomb๐คprofilefollow
Another tired millenialreplied to@prophetorit๐งprofilefollow
grand and intoxicating innocence
always online:
Another tired millenialreplied to@prophetorit๐งprofilefollowgrand and intoxicating innocence
always online:art that can make you cry, and sticks with you is good art though โก
@kapankatsuragiprofilefollow
I may know more about Disney History and trivia than you. Maybe, I dunno.
I write about pop culture on Super Review Time.wrote:
I may know more about Disney History and trivia than you. Maybe, I dunno.
I write about pop culture on Super Review Time.wrote:only when the bullied attacks the bully, it's when the teacher intervenes
I have a theory that it's because they fear the weaker one that has been suffering and bottling emotions for days, weeks, or even months. once it's unbottled, the bullied won't stop until they're sure they won't be bullied again, and that could be bad... for the school and the teacher.
replied to@kapankatsuragiprofilefollowI may know more about Disney History and trivia than you. Maybe, I dunno.
I write about pop culture on Super Review Time.:
I may know more about Disney History and trivia than you. Maybe, I dunno.
I write about pop culture on Super Review Time.:might be true
I though textlog was a gonner there. It was several hours with just a 502 response. Glad to see it's back!
Drew a comic of vulpes inculta and my oc, I love SO MUCH!!
ibb.co/B2x8dq9n
(Opinion) People donโt like generative AI because it made the {insert creativity} too easy. Saw the HN post on โAI music banned from top 40 chart in Australiaโ and people had very strong opinions in both directions.
The hot take: If youโre ok with someoneโs creativity being outsourced to others, then you should be ok with AI doing the same.
If โAI made this and I call it mineโ is bad but โsomeone overseas on fivver made this and I call it mineโ and itโs suddenly ok, time to self reflect.
โฆ
My hot take: from the moment you use technology, be it an instrument, a synthesizer, a DAW, and now AI, it is still your idea, your effort, your time spent, and that makes it yours. Others can do the same if they choose. The same way someone chooses a classic guitar over a synthesizer, one can choose an AI over (insert ancient way of doing things).
โฆ
Youโre rolling the dice whenever you are searching for a sample or a preset in a synthesizer. Eventually itโs what โsounds goodโ, so still the effort is your judgement and the time spent finding that โdice rollโ that sounded well.
I am not a musician, so I lack the jargon to properly explain what I mean.
I used AI for creative writing (nothing too fancy, TTRPG). There, the broader the dice roll, the more generic and uninteresting the results. Slop, if you will. It was surprisingly good to build up on ideas I had however.
I imagine muisic also has building blocks. Melodies, instruments, mixing, etc. AI can perhaps be used in a similar fashion there.
I heard a perspective I sort of like: if AI is a tool then acceptable AI use is, more or less, defined as "when my audience no longer notices or cares". It's dynamic like that. Bad photoshop is detectable and annoying, so are overusing presets. Your artistry needs to expand to meet the tool.
I don't know if I 100% like that or agree. At the same time, it's a pretty straightforward line, a practical take.