textlog
๐Ÿฆ›profilefollowStrictly no LLMs. No exceptions.wrote:
Seems the spammers have arrived. โ˜น๏ธ Is there (or can there be) some mechanism to flag posts or accounts as spam?
โ€ฆ
profilefollow"Beware those that would deny you access to information, for in their heart they dream themselves your master." โ€” Sid Meyersreplied to๐Ÿฆ›profilefollowStrictly no LLMs. No exceptions.:
What the "for you" means? Often I find things there, but, why are they "for me"? What's the criteria? Same for "to me". Are "to me" replies to my notes, or comments, or are they something else? I will start by defining what exactly are those two, before getting into further weeds.
@ โ†’ smallest token, visited less often than the rest, very visible when it has a counter that you need to pay attention to (someone interacted with you) my feed โ†’ largest token, this is where you should be spending your time mostly. right now itโ€™s everything youโ€™re following, but in the future might be enriched, so itโ€™s a feed of information, my feed of information hot โ†’ obvious, unambiguous all โ†’ simply everything thatโ€™s posted. clearly communicated.
All have different dimensions & shapes. for you -> personalization -> feed / my feed / my textlog / >_ (branded) for me -> directionality -> mentions / my mentions / @me @ is also directionality signifier hot -> popularity -> hot all -> firehose/chronology -> latest, tho it does create a endo-hit Goofy shorthand experiments (maybe superscripts?): >_ @me !hot *all or: >_ @ ! *
As long as we're doing this, may I put forth that the "hot" tab runs counter to the principle that removing view counts and timestamps seemed to embody? I'd rather have a "random" tab than a hot. I liked your impulse to design around dopamine rather than at it.
Iโ€™ve given a lot of thought about that. My thinking was to keep some older nice posts a bit more alive to keep the discussion going. And it works to a percentage. But as it is now with the new conversation views it overlaps a lot with โ€œlatestโ€ as the active conversations get bumped to the top anyway, so the current โ€œhotโ€ topics are in latestโ€™s first page naturally. So I might refactor the algorithm a bit to favor top level posts. I think itโ€™s worth it, new users especially discover posts there..
Furthermore, writing again to your surfaced spaced repetition would, as a side-effect, bubble up to the all & potentially hot feeds making new content visible to others. It's not a fully shaped or realized concept. Just dreaming up other ideas.
profilefollowlate is the hour in which this conjuror chooses to appearreplied to๐Ÿฆ›profilefollowStrictly no LLMs. No exceptions.:
Using the internet these days is like pulling off an elaborate heist operation. Every time I successfully load a page I feel like I've "gotten away with something".
๐Ÿฆ›profilefollowStrictly no LLMs. No exceptions.replied toprofilefollowlate is the hour in which this conjuror chooses to appear:
It is sometimes tempting to mutter, "I'm in!" in your movie hacker voice when you finally get past all the cookie/subscription/notification pop-ups.
๐Ÿฆ›profilefollowStrictly no LLMs. No exceptions.wrote:
Well this looks very nice indeed. Just dipping a hoof into the river for now ...
join the communityorbrowse more notes