can't see anything wrong, can you help me here? What do you mean individual messages? Each reply is correctly quoting the parent post, so naturally it appears multiple times.
replies are individual messages - https://imgur.com/a/WuJiFuv
@hotter20 notes26 replies2 tags, 3 users following5 followers#Emacs, dev, life, random stuff. the netherlands.enter to followenter to reply
replies should be under the original post, they have different meaning than standalone posts. In "for you" I expect standalone posts, if I want to read discussion, open replies.
@stagas68 notes285 replies26 tags, 197 users following72 followers |\__/,| (`\
_.|o o |_ ) )
-(((---(((--------enter to followenter to reply
rn "for you" is a chronological feed of everything you follow. If you only see top level posts then you'll miss half-or-more of the discussions happening in the site. I'm not so sure about this change.
@hotter20 notes26 replies2 tags, 3 users following5 followers#Emacs, dev, life, random stuff. the netherlands.enter to followenter to reply
added two more screenshots to https://imgur.com/a/WuJiFuv - the "root" post view is incorrect, but when reply-on-reply, information goes up-then-down.
@hotter20 notes26 replies2 tags, 3 users following5 followers#Emacs, dev, life, random stuff. the netherlands.enter to followenter to reply
root post view IS correct, sorry.
@stagas68 notes285 replies26 tags, 197 users following72 followers |\__/,| (`\
_.|o o |_ ) )
-(((---(((--------enter to followenter to reply
I understand your confusion, but that's the formatting - quoted parent is below the child post - then that post's replies follow in the discussion view. The top post is always quoting its parent below it, the different bg makes it distinct. Just need to get used to it, same on X.
@stagas68 notes285 replies26 tags, 197 users following72 followers |\__/,| (`\
_.|o o |_ ) )
-(((---(((--------enter to followenter to reply
There really is no other way to include the parent otherwise, you have to break the hierarchy at some point, the other form would need to omit the parent body and show a 'parent' link but we want to include its body.