#promptengineering

wrote:

cool new for ! autotag action will enrich your post with relevant hashtags so you don’t have to do it manually. It uses an to do it so it is quite good. Try it!

…

replied to:

How do you avoid the creation of too many tags? Does it check existing tags in order to favor them? Or it tags each post independently of how other people are tagging theirs?

replied to:

I simply tell the do fewer than 5 . But it does exceed them often.

replied to:

I mean, a profiferation of tags in the system, not on a given post. I mean, maybe you would want to use the same tags for the same topics in different posts. I'm not sure if I'm clear enough.

replied to:

Ah I understand now. No I’m not passing the current tags in the prompt, but we have a tag aliases system in case we want to group tags with similar meaning. For example I’ve grouped into also — we also use WordNet to canonicalize tag names, stuff like become #tag or becomes .

replied to:

You've thought everything! You are building a nice little tool here. :-)

continued:

The alias system is automatic (LLMs?) or is it manual?

replied to:

It’s manual for now through the admin UI.

replied to:

Something to be automated in the future. 😉

replied to:

Cool. If you run every post via this auto tag feature, then the process is vulnerable to prompt injection attack. Isn’t it? Do you have any special protection in place? I guess yes. Curious.

replied to:

It doesn’t run on every post, you run it yourself via more → autotag, and it’s safe, it doesn’t have access to anything other than the post content and we simply use its response. Or do you have any other case in mind?

…

replied to:

I just tried and i do believe it is possible to craft malicious prompts. I can share an example. How do i DM you?

replied to:

Check the IRC at the footer or you can send to ‘abuse@textlog.cc’ so I find it.

join the communityorbrowse more notes

#PromptEngineering