textlog
I'm trying to construct an argument that LLMs are like a chess engine. People still play chess. But somehow this falls short.
๐Ÿ˜ฐprofilefollowwrote:
#AInotesfollow brings so many issues. It really accelerates. Not only the good parts but also the bad parts. Combine this with a product person that doesn't even know what a refinement is. I'm 41, maybe I'll study to pivot, maybe I'll get into trading. I can't handle it anymore.
profilefollow#Emacsnotesfollow, dev, life, random stuff. the netherlands.continued:
I prefer solo thinking on a problem, in slow mode; then provide solution design for review. Most of the items coming to refinement don't even require solution design, only knowledge of existing system. Yet this practice exists, which slows things down.
๐Ÿ˜ฐprofilefollowreplied toprofilefollow#Emacsnotesfollow, dev, life, random stuff. the netherlands.:
Architect/lead have a pre-refinement with product to clear 80% of the obvious questions. We share an agenda, devs can ask questions async. In the refinement product presents, we design a solution draft. 15 minutes/item. This doesn't work if product is incompetent and everything is AI-slopped.
join the communityorbrowse more notes