any · textlog

wrote:

LOL! love the enshittificator campaign from Norway!!

wrote:

time

wrote:

this looks cool

wrote:

“Every problem that is interesting is also soluble.” - David Deutsch

wrote:

tech influencers on twitter: god i hate interacting with other people. i love my new bot that does it for me. life is so much better now that im just telling bots what to do and not talking to people. i can’t wait for everyone to be bots!

wrote:

Any users around? I have been customizing it to the way I work, as it is meant to be. Bent it in a way that I enjoy holding it, so to say. Maybe someone will find those useful, so I took the time to get it published. Gruntfooot is a footer customization, where you can try new colors/glyphs in real time and also has theme support.

continued:

Piflux is a coding workflow. You can steer software development by running commands that issue reasonably general prompts. /plan, /code, /review I created this because I find it very useful to have different models/ perform each of those tasks in isolated sessions. Managing this manually was very much a hassle.

wrote:

The pendulum has swung far in the direction of favouring machine generated content over that from actual people. I wonder when it will swing back?

replied to:

What pendulum? The algorithms’? I don’t think any human is happy about their feeds filling with slop.

wrote:

I'm curious how do people start writing longer novels.. what determines the length of it? Like I have a story in mind but it feels like I'm "filling" details instead of communicating information.

replied to:

I have a novelist friend, she usually starts with the characters and the ending and as you wrote, "filling" the details backward/forward

wrote:

& ˢ ᵖ ᵃ ᶜ ⁱ ⁿ ᵍ ~ ELDER FUTHARK: ᚠ ᚢ ᚦ ᚨ ᚱ ᚲ ᚷ ᚹ ᚺ ᚾ ᛁ ᛃ ᛇ ᛈ ᛉ ᛊ ᛏ ᛒ ᛖ ᛗ ᛚ ᛜ ᛞ ᛟ

replied to:

i perfer anglosaxon runes but thanks

wrote:

hey, here! I was a coder not so long ago, and while I search for new tags for myself, why not searching for new ways to connect with people too?

replied to:

yay! have a good time on here Fixed!

replied to:

thanks!!

…

replied to:

Hey, nice to meet you! What made you quit coding?

replied to:

Same! Didn't quit, but I don't think I'm a coder anymore. I don't know if I'm an AI orchestrator, harness programmer, dark factory manager or whatever title we come up next, but it's been a while since I wrote my last LoC. What about you? Saw some Pi on your feed. How are you navigating this?

…

replied to:

I just incorporated AI into my workflow. A new tool I am meant to master. The nature of what I do has not fundamentally changed, only the process of how to do it. Ironically I don't use Pi at work (only Claude Code was allowed there), but it is what I enjoy using on my personal projects. I love how flexible it is.

wrote:

Monthly Mixtape - Sep 2026

wrote:

Genuinely needed strace and got sMACed across my face.

wrote:

anyone else seriously into agentic loop development?

replied to:

I've been working with physical AI - Letting LLMs control robots in a warehouse to collaborate and collectively come up with a physically correct solution to carry out a natural language intent. We had to study the reactive nature of agents, nudges they required, etc.

replied to:

that's awesome and near my heart. I kicked off a personal project emergingrobotics.ai

replied to:

haha that's a coincidence. Site looks awesome. The moving away from ROS2 part is so true. One of our main potential customers for physical AI solutions (a telecom provider in JP) communicated the need for agents to be able to pick up controls from any vendor

…

continued:

I apologize if that sounded obvious/non-obvious/amateurish haha. I was an intern and worked more on the agentic side of things, it was just a non-primary experiment

wrote:

code quality is about coupling. coupling is not a technical property of the code bytes. code acquires its meaning in contact with the cultural environment, and coupling is about meaning. two constants with no semantic relationship are nonetheless coupled in pragmatics if they refer to the same domain concept. if your goal is to minimise the time integral of future work, you must understand your domain: it decides which lines will need changing. to carve up a codebase is to carve up the world.

replied to:

I think you're right but executing on that idea requires a lot of care. It's similar to how functional programmers pathologically fear state; sometimes coupling/state are a necessary evil in order to keep the theory simple.

replied to:

true! i might have been wiser to say: code quality is about managing coupling across the whole system. extracting a coupling sometimes requires you to introduce complexity beyond that which the extraction reduces.

wrote:

Another day missing Aaron Swartz.

wrote:

Is it just my phone or is HN down? I haven't been able to access at all today

replied to:

Just your phone. Works for me. Try

replied to:

That works. About time for a new phone though

…

wrote:

What could possibly go wrong?

replied to:

ooh maybe I revive and add this feature but instead of being able to modify everything it would be limited to adding features to the game/world. And it’s the perfect domain, a site that’s been ~~entirely~~ mostly hallucinated.

replied to:

Oh wow that site is amazing lol not seen it before

…

replied to:

ty! it’s been 3–4 months since I made it so it’s relatively new.

wrote:

WezTerm for local and remote multiplexing really is the ideal experience - it's so much better than using zellij, tmux, zmx, and friends.. I don't think they pitch this feature hard enough on their site. I think the in-terminal multiplexers have their place - e.g. if you need to access from mobile (no WezTerm there) or on machines where you simply don't want to install WezTerm for some reason. WezTermrm could probably eliminate that last one by packaging just the mux server.

wrote:

in a hackathon rn. building a cloud platform for agents on my homelab.

wrote:

hi

replied to:

hi there ;) welcome

Any conversation