any · textlog

wrote:

1 watermelon 17kg, ~2kg of meat (lamb, beef and chicken) for barbecue, paprika and green peppers, zucchini. Total 92 eur. Life’s expensive in 2026.

replied to:

its true. but meat should be expensive imo

wrote:

I really needed a quiet microblog. This looks like exactly what I'm looking for.

replied to:

Same. I really wish this platform would last a long time... I've seen so many cool initiatives get posted on HN, only to be taken offline a few months later.

wrote:

Reading Slow Productivity by Cal Newport, discovered via onboarding content in mymind mymind.com

wrote:

Another little corner of the internet. Anything using fixed-width fonts and without pictures has surely got to be promising in this day and age, surely...

wrote:

So, I just got an invite to the new W Social (EU) platform. It requires proper ID authentication - so actual provable humans are on there. Feels good and slightly optimistic. Let's see how it goes.

wrote:

Trying out a new place for Friday happy hour. Local pizza place with cheese slices

wrote:

Hello World! :D

replied to:

Hello!

wrote:

again. Was in the middle of some timeline experiments, sorry if it appears weird rn. www.githubstatus.com

wrote:

I can't figure out what's leaking on my '73 F250. Shows up slowly at the back of the oil pan. It's pretty clear because I've recently changed fluids and scrubbed the engine. It was definitely brake fluid for a while after it was overfilled but that has evened out. The oil level is steady after when checking every 10 miles or so. I think anyway... hard to know with these 😬

wrote:

A show code

n=27;s=[n]
while n!=1:
    n=n//2 if n%2==0 else 3*n+1;s.append(n)
for v in s[:15]:print(f"{v:>4} "+"█"*min(v//3,40))
print(f"{len(s)} steps, peak {max(s)}")

stdout length exceeded

wrote:

Blasting 1's and 0's to a far off land at the speed of light locking them in place until someone else wants to see them.

replied to:

can imagine this like Pink Floyd lyrics

wrote:

Hello to friends. Holla for tools. 👨‍💻 : , , and Pragmata Pro 💪 : NotePlan 🎧 : Overcast 🧠 : Allume 🖋️ : Mark Two (EDC), Pen Type-B 🌳 : Anisota

wrote:

there's so much room for activities!

wrote:

Listening to aphex twin. Why do people pretend to like this guy? People have forgotten about being themselves

wrote:

┌────────────┐ │ ╔═╗ ╔═╗ │ │ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ │ │ ┌────────┐ │ │ └─██████─┘ │ │ ██████ │ └────────────┘ ,

wrote:

This is my first note, there are many like it, but this one is mine.

wrote:

Which do you think is ?

…

replied to:

Microservices. Not really programming, as this is more on the architectural level. Microservices is a valid approach when you need to address massive scale. The thing is, I have seen it applied to things that could realistically serve its audience in a handful of modest servers with a less fashionable approach. It was done under the guise of simplification; each individual microservice was in fact very small. But this at the cost of absolute spaghetti architecture.

replied to:

This indeed makes sense, it is a lot more like locality, if a concept doesn't needs a function, don't give it a function

wrote:

anyone else seriously into agentic loop development?

replied to:

I've been working with physical AI - Letting LLMs control robots in a warehouse to collaborate and collectively come up with a physically correct solution to carry out a natural language intent. We had to study the reactive nature of agents, nudges they required, etc.

replied to:

that's awesome and near my heart. I kicked off a personal project emergingrobotics.ai

replied to:

haha that's a coincidence. Site looks awesome. The moving away from ROS2 part is so true. One of our main potential customers for physical AI solutions (a telecom provider in JP) communicated the need for agents to be able to pick up controls from any vendor

…

continued:

I apologize if that sounded obvious/non-obvious/amateurish haha. I was an intern and worked more on the agentic side of things, it was just a non-primary experiment

wrote:

Got a bunch of things to do, hate procrastination, any advice is welcome

replied to:

Make a list, then tackle each thing individually until it's done

replied to:

Gotta give it try, by now making a list is like the top of the list

…

replied to:

Determine what matters most and make a list of the no more than 7 things. Do one thing well at a time, top down. Reprioritise as you learn more. Notes:

If you half-arse a task and decide that'll do, it's evidence it wasn't the right priority. Learn.
Any sort of productivity, multi-tasking, app, solution type thing is a scam or a money grab and isn't needed.
People tend to remember 7 things well, but struggle with longer lists and particularly fail to remember things in the middle.

Any conversation