Finally got around to setting up Remux on my phone so I can connect to tmux sessions when I'm not at my laptop. Even just for around the house, this seems like it'll be super useful.
Any conversation
Tell us more! What apps are you operating?
This is for monitoring/poking agentic coding sessions while I'm not at my computer. So, typically Claude, Emacs, and an overmind process running my app locally in different panes of a tmux window.
Call me old fashioned, but instead of adopting one of the "agentic coding orchestration frameworks" that seem to basically be reinventions of tmux, I've been tweaking my tried-and-true tmux-oriented workflow to incorporate agentic coding harnesses in an ergonomic way. I'm currently still using Claude Code, but getting Pi-curious as local models advance.
@fastidiousprofilefollow
"Beware those that would deny you access to information, for in their heart they dream themselves your master." โ Sid Meyersreplied to:
"Beware those that would deny you access to information, for in their heart they dream themselves your master." โ Sid Meyersreplied to:I will be dead, and many years will pass after that, before local models are capable to match those of the big companies, unless their intended use is banal.
replied to@fastidiousprofilefollow"Beware those that would deny you access to information, for in their heart they dream themselves your master." โ Sid Meyers:
"Beware those that would deny you access to information, for in their heart they dream themselves your master." โ Sid Meyers:It seems like we've reached a point where mid-grade frontier models like Sonnet are good enough for most day-to-day tasks. And Sonnet-grade models are already runnable on the higher end of consumer hardware.
In which case, I can imagine a workflow where local models serve as workhorses for implementing plans that you may bump up to e.g. Opus or Sol to produce.
๐ฒ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐๐ฟ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ ยท๐๐ฑ๐๐พ๐ฏ ๐ฆ๐ ๐ฏ๐ช๐ ๐๐ฉ๐๐น๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ ๐ท๐๐ด-๐๐ฎ๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ค๐ฑ๐๐ฉ๐ฏ.
Iโm assuming is not supported for auto-translation.
nope, google translate doesnโt support it :( looks beautiful though
Hmm, maybe Iโll sometimes post in Shavian anyway and translate myself. Itโs a skill Iโm trying to practice but rarely otherwise write brief enough notes to be so inclined.
๐ฃ๐ฉ๐ฅ, ๐ฅ๐ฑ๐๐ฐ ๐ฒ๐ค ๐๐ณ๐ฅ๐๐ฒ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ด๐๐ ๐ฆ๐ฏ ยท๐๐ฑ๐๐พ๐ฏ ๐ง๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฑ ๐ฏ ๐๐ฎ๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ค๐ฑ๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ง๐ค๐. ๐ฆ๐๐ ๐ฉ ๐๐๐ฆ๐ค ๐ฒ๐ฅ ๐๐ฎ๐ฒ๐ฆ๐ ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐จ๐๐๐ฆ๐ ๐๐ณ๐ ๐ฎ๐บ๐ค๐ฆ ๐ณ๐๐ผ๐ข๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ณ๐ ๐ฎ๐ด๐๐ ๐ ๐ ๐๐ด ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐๐ค๐ฒ๐ฏ๐.
Having spent the last 12 months using HTMX in $day_job, after 5 years with react, I have come to the opinion that whilst large amounts of JS and CSS are not necessarily wrong, they should be reserved for progressively extending the platform with a composable set of generic UI primitives that build out a cohesive design language โ encoding business logic (including routing) there is generally a mistake
Past year's personal projects that went viral:
Yet I'm poor and can't get an interview :S how do I solve this?
โฆ
personal projects probably just arent the right knob if you want to get unpoor. if you want my honest advice i would recommend not showing hallucinate to potential employers, its landing page looks one-shot claude and is gpu heavy. but the others look very nice.
โฆ
nice to hear though! did you like it? living in berlin for 6 years now
(Opinion) People donโt like generative AI because it made the {insert creativity} too easy. Saw the HN post on โAI music banned from top 40 chart in Australiaโ and people had very strong opinions in both directions.
The hot take: If youโre ok with someoneโs creativity being outsourced to others, then you should be ok with AI doing the same.
If โAI made this and I call it mineโ is bad but โsomeone overseas on fivver made this and I call it mineโ and itโs suddenly ok, time to self reflect.
โฆ
My hot take: from the moment you use technology, be it an instrument, a synthesizer, a DAW, and now AI, it is still your idea, your effort, your time spent, and that makes it yours. Others can do the same if they choose. The same way someone chooses a classic guitar over a synthesizer, one can choose an AI over (insert ancient way of doing things).
โฆ
Youโre rolling the dice whenever you are searching for a sample or a preset in a synthesizer. Eventually itโs what โsounds goodโ, so still the effort is your judgement and the time spent finding that โdice rollโ that sounded well.
I am not a musician, so I lack the jargon to properly explain what I mean.
I used AI for creative writing (nothing too fancy, TTRPG). There, the broader the dice roll, the more generic and uninteresting the results. Slop, if you will. It was surprisingly good to build up on ideas I had however.
I imagine muisic also has building blocks. Melodies, instruments, mixing, etc. AI can perhaps be used in a similar fashion there.
I heard a perspective I sort of like: if AI is a tool then acceptable AI use is, more or less, defined as "when my audience no longer notices or cares". It's dynamic like that. Bad photoshop is detectable and annoying, so are overusing presets. Your artistry needs to expand to meet the tool.
I don't know if I 100% like that or agree. At the same time, it's a pretty straightforward line, a practical take.