Bad night, first the boy woke up at midnight and went with him, then at 4 am heavy rain started so went to bring the bike to the terrace, then thunderstorm and kids were scary, then the cat meowed at 6am. Iโm okay.
Any conversation
โขโกโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ
โขปโฃฟโกโขถโฃคโฃโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โฃโฃ โฃ
โ โขปโฃโ โ โ โ ณโฃฆโฃโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โฃโฃคโ ถโ โ โฃนโฃฟโกฟ
โ โ โ นโฃโ โ โ โ โ โขทโฃโฃโฃโฃโฃคโฃคโฃคโฃโฃโฃดโ โ โ โ โ โ โขโฃฟโกโ
โ โ โ โ โขทโกโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โฃ โกพโ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โ โ ปโกถโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โข โฃ โกพโ โ โ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โ โฃผโ โ โข โ โฃโ โ โ โ โ โ โข โขฒโฃโ โ โ โขปโฃโ โ โ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โขฐโกโ โ โ โ โ โ โขโฃโกโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โฃฟโกโ โ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โฃพโกโ โขณโ โ โ โ โ โฃโฃโ โ โ โ โฃฐโขโ โฃถโ โขนโฃโ โ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โขฟโกโ โ โ โ โ โ โฃพโ โ โขฑโ โ โ โ โ ฒโ โ โ โ โฃฟโ โ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โ โขทโกโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โขปโกโ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โ โ โกโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โขธโฃง โ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ
been building a voice first os using jev and some small voice models. I'm surprised how well it's working and I'm very close to the point where I can go into a feedback mode and tell it what behavior I want changed, it will spin up Claude or codex inside itself and setup the build to restart itself and continue with new code. tempted to let it build itself completely
Sunk cost fallacy is no longer applicable in the age of . Now you can do broad changes without second thought, u can always revert back, without incurring the cost of doing so, since itโs all done so quickly and effortlessly.
I think it will still apply, just perhaps to a lesser degree. Kind of related to I wrote recently (not to shamelessly plug my stuff ๐ซฃ)
โฆ
Is this true? Sometimes, AI allows for socratic thinking, this is, the conversation with the machine allows the thinker to go further as the AI thorws ideas to the conversation. Many times, the AI reasoning is not good enough, but like a friend that says a funny think that sparks an idea, the AI can help our brain to see other possible paths.
The AI doesn't need to be right to be helpful
ะฆะฒะตัะพะบ ัะพะทั ะฝะต ะธะทะดะฐะตั ะณะพะปะพัะฐ, ะฐ ะฑะปะฐะณะพัั
ะฐะฝะธะต ะตะณะพ ะดะฐะปะตะบะพ ัะฐัั
ะพะดะธััั ะผะพะปัะฐ; ัะฐะบ ะฝะฐะดะพ ะถะธัั ะธ ะฒัะตะผ ั
ัะธััะธะฐะฝะฐะผ.
โะกะฒััะธัะตะปั ะคะตะพัะฐะฝ ะะฐัะฒะพัะฝะธะบ
The rose flower makes no sound, but its fragrance spreads far and wide in silence; so should all Christians live.
โSt. Theophan the Recluse
I have to constantly be working or I get very agitated. Is this ? I donโt like entertainment other than background music while working and maybe before going to sleep I watch a series on Netflix to relax. Thatโs when Iโm on my introvert mode. When Iโm extrovert (Iโm ambivert) I have to constantly be around people and outdoors, I get agitated indoors, canโt work at all and definitely canโt watch anything. How do these two personalities co-exist in me?
Last year I wasn't feeling too good.
I turned forty, waited for surgery, and was hurt by my own colleagues. So I dealt with things. Maybe not so well, but to the best of my ability.
One of the consequences was that I got a bit heavy. My body changed, and I didn't feel like myself. It was a problem for future me. So now I am here with this little belly of mine. We're not enemies, but I decided it's time to part ways.
So I count calories. Maybe not so well, but to the best of my ability.
Really glad to be using Haskell for work - especially in today's climate with agentic coding.
Our team uses containers to keep our development environment consistent across team members, though, and most agent sandbox approaches want to either offload your work fully to the cloud or they want to sandbox the agent harness process itself.
We're not ready for full cloud based development (yet?) and sandboxing just the agent doesn't work for us when the agent needs to run docker.
... because letting the agent run docker gives them a too-easy escape hatch from their sandbox.
So we're currently stuck with using VMs. This turns out to be tricky but seems do-able.
My current approach is to provision a VM image and use Incus for the execution. My main goal is to keep my current workflow of local/non-agent dev working seamlessly and share the source with the VM/agent.
This means sharing my working dirs with the agent VM but overlaying artifact dirs from VM-owned block devices so we don't take too big of an IO perf hit.
I also don't want the agent to be able to
git push so that means we need some quirky git config to rewrite origin paths and thread through some agent specific PATs ("thanks" GitHub) for read-only repo access. These ALSO need to be threaded through to the development containers - they need to clone private repos.... in the end, this seems to work but I haven't lived with it for long.
There are still some quality of life issues to work out, but I think it'll work out.
At this point, I've removed all coding agents from my host - and that's nice.
Curious, why does using Haskell make a difference here?
It's tangential to the sandboxing topic, really. I started the first post with a broader intent in mind and then elaborated on the sandboxing setup I'm working on.
For AI-assisted coding, though, it's nice because Haskell provides a lot of feedback earlier in the development process compared to lots of other languages. It tends to work once it compiles (obviously not all the time).