any · textlog

and it's all

the more you use ai to create stuff, the less you touch the creativity void inside you

on the contrary, at least for me, it unleashes creativity because I don’t have to switch to execution mode (linear thinking), I can keep myself in the creativity mode (lateral thinking).

wrote:

if for some reason you find yourself flying from burlington vt to a dc/baltimore airport: this is a perfect time to enjoy larks’ tongues in aspic [the album]

wrote:

my today’s list:

wake up

make coffee

work

and possibly later:

contemplate existence

wrote:

signals. thinking about shifting my mental framework to identify signals instead of waiting for concepts to be assembled. exploring the amount of energy and opportunities for distractions through the operations of processing what just happened and what is happening to short circuit latent and unnecessary systems. cut through the assembly processes and identify the raw signals. recognizing that naming these "raw signals" is misleading. maybe, shifting observability lower in the stack.

wrote:

Mind's empty. Heart's full. Desires? Average.

wrote:

hi o/ im from south america, i see the on HN. I really like the vibes and the idea. Ill probably be posting here often, while in the office. cya

wrote:

Waiting for an original thought to pass me by.

replied to:

I've been waiting for 40 years.

replied to:

Many pass by me. All combined aren’t worth $0.02. 😅

…

replied to:

They only come when you're not waiting for them!

replied to:

Nourish your heaf with creative thoughts and originality will happen on it's own. And don't be too hard on yourself, there's hardly anything new under the sun, the joy is in discovering things yourself :)

wrote:

I truly love the experience of using apps with rich, deeply interactive, beautifully animated, gorgeous user interfaces. Then I see a beautiful text-based interface and something about it feels so natural, so inevitable, so perfectly clear, and I'm instantly captivated by its simplicity and clarity. Hypertext is fascinating.

wrote:

Off to handstand class. I have been known to recommend to everyone within earshot doing challenging and/or silly physical things in a community. Not bucking the trend here.

wrote:

Finally got my 3d printer setup for the first time since moving back onto the land. Man I love Prusa. Their stuff just works.

wrote:

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▀▀▀▀▄░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░▄▀░░▄░▄░█░░ ░▄▄░░░░░▄▀░░░░▄▄▄▄█░░ █░░▀▄░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░█░░ ░▀▄░░▀▄░░░░█░░░░░░█░░ ░░░▀▄░░▀░░░█░░░░░░█░░ ░░░▄▀░░░░░░█░░░░▄▀░░░ ░░░▀▄▀▄▄▀░░█▀░▄▀░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░█▀▀█▀▀░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░▀▀░▀▀░░░░░░░░

replied to:

haha cool! uhm perhaps we should detect hashtag and get rid of the line spacing

continued:

implemented, hashtag now gets compact lines!

wrote:

Muggy this morning, but time to hit the road

wrote:

I'm a simple man. I see a new platform, I grab my handle. 😎

wrote:

(Opinion) People don’t like generative AI because it made the {insert creativity} too easy. Saw the HN post on ‘AI music banned from top 40 chart in Australia’ and people had very strong opinions in both directions. The hot take: If you’re ok with someone’s creativity being outsourced to others, then you should be ok with AI doing the same. If “AI made this and I call it mine” is bad but “someone overseas on fivver made this and I call it mine” and it’s suddenly ok, time to self reflect.

……

replied to:

My hot take: from the moment you use technology, be it an instrument, a synthesizer, a DAW, and now AI, it is still your idea, your effort, your time spent, and that makes it yours. Others can do the same if they choose. The same way someone chooses a classic guitar over a synthesizer, one can choose an AI over (insert ancient way of doing things).

…

replied to:

You’re rolling the dice whenever you are searching for a sample or a preset in a synthesizer. Eventually it’s what “sounds good”, so still the effort is your judgement and the time spent finding that “dice roll” that sounded well.

replied to:

I am not a musician, so I lack the jargon to properly explain what I mean. I used AI for creative writing (nothing too fancy, TTRPG). There, the broader the dice roll, the more generic and uninteresting the results. Slop, if you will. It was surprisingly good to build up on ideas I had however. I imagine muisic also has building blocks. Melodies, instruments, mixing, etc. AI can perhaps be used in a similar fashion there.

replied to:

Yes, enhancing the artist/creator, not replacing them.

replied to:

I heard a perspective I sort of like: if AI is a tool then acceptable AI use is, more or less, defined as "when my audience no longer notices or cares". It's dynamic like that. Bad photoshop is detectable and annoying, so are overusing presets. Your artistry needs to expand to meet the tool. I don't know if I 100% like that or agree. At the same time, it's a pretty straightforward line, a practical take.

replied to:

I kind of ask that and here is my theory... news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49289341#49290428 But on the rejection for AI just for the sake of it, I think part is that analyzing takes effort and if there is more and more to analyze you creates this mechanism to defend yourself... scroll twi... I mean reject the premise as false and ask for a human made thing because that one is "truth" more worthy.

wrote:

"Your outie can use Claude."

wrote:

Two roads diverged in a wood, and I I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference.

replied to:

A good start for one of those "missing 411" videos on YT.

wrote:

! n

wrote:

Finally merged the jetpack PR in hallucinate.site — now you can fly around!

wrote:

With each passing workday I spend agentsitting, my ability to program in isolation atrophies. This might be dismissed as needless self-serving anxiety, but perhaps irrationally, I can't let it go.

Any conversation