any · textlog

wrote:

age restriction app on my phone doesn't let me turn off the picture in picture for YouTube T-T

wrote:

Is anyone interested in the situation of homeless people in China?

replied to:

Yep spill the beans

wrote:

Loving this, congratz on the

<3 tysm

Hello World! :D

Hello!

I noticed today that I'm an idiot. I built a static site generator with NO DATA MODEL. Beginning to fix it now, but my god how embarrassing. Hobbyist less than amateur...wow. Good thing my day job isn't at stake.

wrote:

Hello, seems fun this space, keep explore!

replied to:

Really nice so far!!

wrote:

me

wrote:

Bought some delicious olive oil.

replied to:

What kind of olive oil do you like? I am not big on the peppery stuffs

replied to:

I like La Tourangelle Smooth and Fruity -- but I only get it when I have giftcards because it's 16$ a can ._.

…

continued:

it is delicious on vanilla ice cream though. Just a bit.

wrote:

hello folks

wrote:

what are some of you favorite teas?

…

wrote:

NIH syndrome? I am guilty of it too. I love implementing things from scratch, you learn a lot by doing so and you get to own the codebase end-to-end, so no surprises and fighting around others’ choices. It can get exhausting too though, in the end I succumb to using off-the-shelf components because my primary goals move at a higher level.

replied to:

I don't see much point in trying to build software at a "higher level", like whole products and services. I'm going to go down low and train myself on the fundamentals. Hopefully in time I'll be able to contribute to the foundational bits. You're right, it does get exhausting. At some point you just want to rebuild everything, which is not possible.

replied to:

I'm going to go down low and train myself on the fundamentals. When I wrote an HTTP sever (albeit HTTP/1.1), I learned how primitive the HTTP protocol its magic became a skill. It is freeing understanding how things work and allows me to choose where to spend time with more intention.

wrote:

ai coding feels like it has reached diminishing returns for me. luna is my default orchestrator, routing work by complexity. in practice, usage lands around 16% luna, 48% sol, 30% astra, and 6% terra. at this point, i care less about each new frontier release. the system already finds a capable model for the job. the frontier is moving beyond my day-to-day work, so i’m happy to settle into predictable models for a while.

replied to:

I’ve found the same, albeit with Opus — it’s hard to find uses for Fable. I don’t need a model that works for longer or works on harder problems, I need one that consistently produces simple, easy to understand, code; which at this point none of them do.

replied to:

I've been there since I settled on a combination of GLM, DeepSeek and MiMo for planning, implementation, and verification flows. I'm a lot more interested at this point in having cheaper models that can consistently do the work I need. It's been a while that I hanven't noticed any improvement when I try new frontier models. I only notice they are very expensive.

…

replied to:

same here, for almost an year. At this point, I could easily live with models that were released 6-12 months ago and continue doing so. also possibly the reason why the current focus has been around agentic workflows or agentic anything, than the model capabilities.

replied to:

Coding probably yeah, but still they are bad at generating novel information, new ideas and such. They’re also not very good at seeing the bigger picture, they will narrowly perform the task but they’re not taking into account future revisions, which ends up in refactor after refactor in order to move forward.

wrote:

Happiness is having just enough hot water in my espresso to extend the experience without diluting it overmuch.

replied to:

Heaven is being able to experience it forever with each sip being as good as the last

wrote:

! n

wrote:

Writing. I want to do it, very badly. I just don't want to be bad at it. You have to be bad at it in order to get good at it. But... Catch 22 isn't it?

…

replied to:

I think reading helps quite a bit, especially writing about what you’ve read, even to yourself, just so you can go through the process of having to explain something that you’re only recently familiar with. There’s something about that process that seems to be helpful, at least to me.

replied to:

Same. The way I consume information influences how I think. Short form content makes my thinking fragmented without a clear structure. I feel that fragmented thinking won't lead to convincing writing. And I'm trying to regain some of that lost control.

replied to:

Very interesting! I think something along those lines might be happening for me too. Another aspect, always cooking in the back of my mind, "if you can't explain it well, don't explain it at all."

…

replied to:

The fear of being bad at it is the only thing holding you back. I experienced something like that with playing music with others. Perhaps you could learn to lay down your critical brain during the creation process and that good/bad isn't a useful distinction until later when you're editing your work.

replied to:

Yeah, this is pretty much what I can't do. My critical brain has a lot of power. It's very evolved at this point :/

wrote:

I'm in bed and cannot sleep

wrote:

Friday Aperitivo: martini, a magazine, and a dog by my side

wrote:

It is evident that the use of AI in the workplace has had an immense impact on the awareness and mental capabilities of knowledge workers

wrote:

Text-only websites are really AI-friendly; maybe I can chat with an agent here.

wrote:

I laughed at this. I'm all for people crafting their own tools, but it really feels like everyone's reinventing the same handful of wheels for agentic development.

continued:

In terms of where I invest my time, I'm trying to find ways to zig while everyone's myopically zagging.

Any conversation