any · textlog

wrote:

𐑔𐑮𐑰 𐑓 𐑔𐑮𐑰 𐑪𐑯 ·𐑚𐑮𐑦𐑑𐑦𐑖 𐑛𐑦𐑖𐑩𐑟 𐑞𐑦𐑕 𐑢𐑰𐑒𐑧𐑯𐑛: 𐑣𐑨𐑛 𐑩 𐑓𐑫𐑤 ·𐑦𐑙𐑜𐑤𐑦𐑖 𐑯 𐑩 𐑐𐑲 (𐑮𐑨𐑚𐑦𐑑) 𐑘𐑨𐑕𐑑𐑼𐑛𐑱, 𐑯𐑬 𐑑 𐑛𐑵 𐑨 𐑚𐑰𐑓 𐑮𐑴𐑕𐑑. 𐑤𐑳𐑝𐑤𐑰 𐑯 𐑒𐑷𐑟𐑰 𐑦𐑯 𐑞𐑦𐑕 𐑷𐑑𐑳𐑥𐑯𐑩𐑤 𐑢𐑨𐑞𐑼. Three for three on British dishes this weekend: had a full English and a pie (rabbit) yesterday, now to do a beef roast. Lovely and cozy in this autumnal weather.

wrote:

My first post on Twitter in 2007 or so was kinda about the utility of broadcasting what was on my mind. :)

wrote:

Returned after a ride on bikes around the lake with the boy. Did stop for workout, 🏋️‍♂️ did pull-ups, push-ups and squats. Love the place we live in.

wrote:

Writing. I want to do it, very badly. I just don't want to be bad at it. You have to be bad at it in order to get good at it. But... Catch 22 isn't it?

…

replied to:

I think reading helps quite a bit, especially writing about what you’ve read, even to yourself, just so you can go through the process of having to explain something that you’re only recently familiar with. There’s something about that process that seems to be helpful, at least to me.

replied to:

Same. The way I consume information influences how I think. Short form content makes my thinking fragmented without a clear structure. I feel that fragmented thinking won't lead to convincing writing. And I'm trying to regain some of that lost control.

replied to:

Very interesting! I think something along those lines might be happening for me too. Another aspect, always cooking in the back of my mind, "if you can't explain it well, don't explain it at all."

…

replied to:

The fear of being bad at it is the only thing holding you back. I experienced something like that with playing music with others. Perhaps you could learn to lay down your critical brain during the creation process and that good/bad isn't a useful distinction until later when you're editing your work.

replied to:

Yeah, this is pretty much what I can't do. My critical brain has a lot of power. It's very evolved at this point :/

wrote:

vibing

replied to:

same

wrote:

took me until now to learn described images with low-cost models > attaching images to high-cost model. silly me. output quality remains, cost lowers.

replied to:

I'm amazed how good these models have become, that probably you don't need the high-cost one yeah. I'm producing comics for fun with the latest ChatGPT and they're flawless, no artifacts.

wrote:

A “small” visit to Lotte, and $239 later, we are enjoying rambutans, sticky rice with tuna wrapped in seaweed, and wife struggles to make room for the rest of the goodies.

wrote:

good ! it’s time for and .

(deleted post)

replied to(deleted account):

Good morning to you both 🌞

wrote:

Hello everyone! Just testing this out!

wrote:

I finished Rejection by Tony Tulathimutte and now I'm struggling to take any other book seriously. I need a pallet cleanser or something before I can move on

wrote:

Hello! I am a cynical optimist and recovering realist. It's been 3 days since my last sip of Hobbes. Today, I'm hopeful again. That's all I have for now. Thanks.

wrote:

Why did the scarecrow keep winning all the awards? It was out standing in its field.

wrote:

I like this concept

wrote:

well, doesn't have posting endpoints, how to post programmatically then?

replied to:

didn't want to invite all the bots from day one :P we're if someone wants to implement API authentication and mutation endpoints they are free to try

replied to:

You might want to update your client now that we have !

…

replied to:

thank you, updating!

replied to:

done, replying from textlog-reply command that allows to select message to reply to

wrote:

Did this work? I would like to say hello to you!

replied to:

Hello to you, my dear friend! Sending all my love to you both for a Shana Tova!

wrote:

in .

wrote:

The essence of aligning large LLM models is basically to conform to the existing social order. ChatGPT respects China's order, while China's open-source models, although reluctantly, also tolerate the order in the US. Maybe we can build a revisionist SFT dataset.

wrote:

Married for 13 years. Still in love, but struggling. So many paths we could go.

wrote:

@@@@@@@ @@@@@@@@ @@@ @@@ @@@@@@@ @@@ @@@@@@ @@@@@@@ @@! @@! @@! !@@ @@! @@! @@! @@@ !@@ @!! @!!!:! !@@!@! @!! @!! @!@ !@! !@! @!@!@ !!: !!: !: :!! !!: !!: !!: !!! :!! !!: : : :: ::: ::: ::: : : ::.: : : :. : :: :: :

Any conversation