any · textlog

500 chars / 20 lines max · use #hashtags, @mentions and more

😀😃😄😁😆😅😂🤣😊😇🙂🙃😉😌😍🥰😘😋😛😜🤪🤨🧐🤓😎🤩🥳😏😒😞😔😟😕🙁☹️😣😖😫😩🥺😢😭😤😠😡🤬🤯😳🥵🥶😱😨😰😥😓🤗🤔🫣🤭🫢🤫🤥😶😐😑😬🙄😯😦😧😮😲🥱😴🤤😪😵🤐🥴🤢🤮🤧😷🤒🤕🤑🤠😈👿👻💀☠️👽🤖🎃😺😸😹😻😼😽🙀😿😾❤️🧡💛💚💙💜🖤🤍🤎💔❣️💕💞💓💗💖💘💝💟👍👎👌🤌✌️🤞🤟🤘🤙👈👉👆👇☝️✋🤚🖐️🖖👋🤝👏🙌🫶👐🤲🙏✍️💪👀👁️🧠🫀🫁🌱🌿☘️🍀🌸🌺🌻🌞🌙⭐✨⚡🔥🌈☀️☁️❄️☕🍕🍎🎉🎊🎈🎁🎵🎶🎨📚💡✅❌⚠️🚀🌍💻📱🔒🔑

example.com or https://example.com
Regular links: [title](example.com) or [title](https://example.com)
Markdown links: ~text~ or ~~text~~
Strikethrough: *text* or **text**
Bold: _text_ or __text__
Underline: /text/
Italics: > text
Quote: :smile
Emoji autocomplete: 1. first 2. second 3. third
Numbered lists: - first - second - third
Bulleted lists: Name | Status | Count ----- | :----- | ----: notes | ready | 3
Tables: |redacted|
Redacted: `code`
Inline code: ```…```
Code fences: $inline$
Inline LaTeX: $$block$$
Block LaTeX

Which one? #poll First option Second option
PollsUse 2–8 unique options.: Which one? #quiz Wrong answer > Correct answer Explanation revealed after answering
QuizzesMark exactly one of 2–8 unique answers with >. Text after a blank line is revealed after answering.: Visible text #spoiler Hidden text
SpoilersText after #spoiler is hidden until revealed. Aliases: #tldr, #sensitive, #contentwarning, #cw, and #triggerwarning.: Going hiking #map Kallikratis, Crete
MapsShows a map preview for the first location line. Alias: #location.: #flying Heraklion to Berlin
FlightsHover over the itinerary to see a map connecting the airports. The next three words form the itinerary: airport, to (or → or ->), airport. Use single-word airport names or IATA/ICAO codes.: Today #todo [ ] First task [x] Finished task
TodosOnly [ ] and [x] lines become items. Click your items to toggle them.: Run this #exec ```js console.log(6 * 7) ```
Executable codeRuns the next language-tagged code fence and shows its output beneath the note.: Keep this visible #pin
Pinned notesYour latest #pin is shown first on your profile, independently for notes and replies.: No more replies #lock
Locked conversationsPrevents new replies to this note and every reply beneath it.: About textlog #meta
Meta conversationsKeeps this note and its replies out of public discovery feeds. Aliases: #tlog and #textlog.: Continue quietly #whisper
Whisper conversationsKeeps the branch out of all and hot. Participants, mentions, and tag followers can receive it in my feed. It remains public elsewhere.: For @someone and @another #private
Private conversationsOnly the author and mentioned users can read this branch.: Answer before reading #HiddenReplies
Hidden repliesHides all replies until you reply.

moreless

wrote:

Friday Aperitivo: martini, a magazine, and a dog by my side

wrote:

Érdekes ez a 4, 2-es irodalmi, valamint programozási hagyomány, amire Douglas Adams hívta fel a figyelmet, nálam ebből a hagyományból 4 a pszichiátriai, 2 a rehabilitációs téma, ami érdekes módon maga is 4, 2-es, ami olyan, mintha rekurzív kezdene lenni, de mégsem az teljesen www.textlog.hu/a-4-adel-es-2-szuzett/

This 4, 2 literary and programming tradition, which Douglas Adams drew attention to, is interesting. In my case, 4 of this tradition are psychiatric and 2 are rehabilitation topics, which is interestingly itself a 4, 2, which seems to be starting to be recursive, but it is not completely www.textlog.hu/a-4-adel-es-2-szuzett/

wrote:

Tax wealth not work

wrote:

I find myself building bespoke tooling for my own and workflows these days, not only because of the obvious reason of software being so much cheaper to build, but also because there are SO MANY options for solving any given problem that it feels impossible to evaluate all of them. If it's not a crucial piece of tech for a work problem then it often feels like paving my own way is both cheaper mentally (kind of amazing that's true these days) and probably a better fit.

continued:

..then of course I have to contend with - "Is this going to be a maintenance nightmare in the future?" and then I still usually conclude "no, the maintenance will be aided by the same approach that the construction was". It's interesting how dramatically and quickly the scales have changed in this equation - and for such a wide range of software.

…

continued:

For example, I am looking for a coding agent coordinator with a particular (but not all that insane) set of requirements. I used both Claude and Perplexity to show me options and break them down by fit against my requirements. I got completely different lists! No overlap! And no perfect fits.

Any conversation