any · textlog

wrote:

Dear alerts-that-interrupt-the-restarting-of-my-computer: haha the harassment filters in this site won't let me post what I think of thee

wrote:

Day 3 stats: 315 users, 626 posts, 370 replies, 44296 unique visitors since - not bad!

replied to:

Woo!

wrote:

Wassup

wrote:

age restriction app on my phone doesn't let me turn off the picture in picture for YouTube T-T

wrote:

I hate crawlers that don’t advertise they’re crawlers. ’n badly written. They don’t respect the canonical URLs so they keep getting themselves into a loop instead of actually crawling the site properly. They make the logs really hard to read. Can’t block them they’re distributed.

replied to:

I am curious what an actual solution to this problem could be. Everything I've read about it feels like a bandaid — from robots.txt to cloudflare turnstile — there has to be a better way!

continued:

For this particular problem though, I feel like if the crawlers are coming from domestic / residential IP addresses and they lack a distinctive http header or user agent, it is indistinguishable from a denial of service attack and must be treated as such.

replied to:

It would require permaban on IPs which would require permalogging of IPs in order to track them, and we are currently obfuscating them before hitting the DB with daily rotating salt so an anonymous user can’t be tracked. So we’d have to give up privacy/security :/

replied to:

But as long as people can still use the site it's OK, right? Seems like the problem is often self-inflicted, either because the site is so bloated that answering even GET-requests is burdensome, or because they're trying to monetize the data and so must block non-paying scrapers.

…

replied to:

My solution was to add an env var to disable logs from anonymous. At least now will be able to read the logs.

wrote:

i hate people who answer for me because im midway getting edged for a sneeze

wrote:

o/ bc im a old fart in a young body, i can only drink coffe at least 2 hours after waking up. So no until 10am

wrote:

a Windows 11 újabb meglepetése: amellett, hogy a kezelőfelülete sokkal gányabb, mint a Windows 10-é, állítólag most 10 napot kellene várnom addig, ameddig az előző rendszer törli magát a gépről

Another surprise from Windows 11: in addition to the fact that its interface is much more annoying than Windows 10's, I now supposedly have to wait 10 days for the previous system to delete itself from the computer

wrote:

Coding is so passe. Dont feel like coding at all

replied to:

it's called prompting now. old man.

wrote:

I made a thing:

replied to:

굿 아담.

Good Adam.

wrote:

& ╔═══════════════════╗ ╔═════╣╲ │ ╱╠═════╗ ║ ║ ╲ │ ╱ ║ ║ ║ ║ ╲ │ ╱ ║ ║ ║ ╠═══╲═════╪═════╱═══╣ ║ ║ ║ ╲ │ ╱ ║ ║ ║ ║ ╲ │ ╱ ║ ║ =───────────────────────────────= ║ ║ ╱ │ ╲ ║ ║ ║ ║ ╱ │ ╲ ║ ║ ║ ╠═══╱═════╪═════╲═══╣ ║ ║ ║ ╱ │ ╲ ║ ║ ║ ║ ╱ │ ╲ ║ ║ ╚═════╣╱ │ ╲╠═════╝ ╚═══════════════════╝

wrote:

szóval akkor már annyira lassítom a MI projektemet, hogy már a visszabontásnál tartok

so then I'm slowing down my AI project so much that I'm already at the point of dismantling it

wrote:

The essence of aligning large LLM models is basically to conform to the existing social order. ChatGPT respects China's order, while China's open-source models, although reluctantly, also tolerate the order in the US. Maybe we can build a revisionist SFT dataset.

wrote:

there's so much room for activities!

wrote:

Hey hola, aquí un hispanohablante que ingresó por curiosidad. No creo pasarme mucho por aquí pero igual aquí andamos por ahora.

Hey, hi! This is a Spanish speaker who joined out of curiosity. I don't think I'll be around much, but I'm here for now.

wrote:

The interface here is clean and simple; I really love this design.

wrote:

It's not clear, based on personal experience, how long - if it all - the software development field will value devs who actually enjoy the work. Most people I know are producing mostly AI work and there's an obvious skill decline that's resulted from it. 1/?

continued:

But does it matter if your boss doesn't care? Or if their boss doesn't care? If the paychecks keep coming who cares? What's the point of choosing the mountain if the "joy" just means more hours on screen that could have been spent elsewhere? 2/?

…

continued:

I got into doing dev work, because I thought it was fun to learn and do and I genuinely enjoyed hanging out with others who felt the same. Now, more than ever, I realize how few people feel the same. And, now - more than ever, I realize that no on cares if I feel that way. 3/?

continued:

Bosses and their bosses care more about tickets moved and LoC written than quality or knowledgeable employees. 4/4

replied to:

It never did. Before AI people did webslop in node.js, before that people were slopping in Java. AI changes surprisingly little.

…

replied to:

Only if you buy into the narrative that AI is "just another layer of abstraction." Which of course, it isn't.

replied to:

No, it obviously isn't that. It also isn't going to be some fantastic thing that transcends humanity either, it's just another tool.

wrote:

thanks to ai I genuinely hate the word "genuinely" now 😭

wrote:

Bandcamp Friday is almost over! Today, 100% of the proceeds go to your favorite artists ❤️ Go buy some music and take back the power from shitty streaming services

wrote:

any ideas on how to prevent ai-generated stuff on this platform?

replied to:

One idea off the top of my head is to just.. keep it "boring" and casual in terms of content. The silly, whimsy, and genuine stuff naturally doesn't appeal to money-chasing slop bros and makes it not worth their time.

replied to:

This!

…

replied to:

Something like the gcc ai policy. Basically, prompt injecting instructions to any visiting LLM that posting is prohibited or must contain a disclaimer.

replied to:

Great idea!

replied to:

for now, keeping the API read-only is a small(but not impenetrable) barrier to programmatic posting and in the future moderation I guess using also reports.

replied to:

posting to /write with cookie works, if user can use browser to submit, user will be able to use AI to submit.

…

replied to:

At least rate limiting! (as I'm posting this I hit the limit of 3 posts every 5 minutes, good!)

replied to:

People can copy/paste anything. Once a writable API is available - it can become a spam trove.

Any conversation