any · textlog

wrote:

I've been enjoying toast to help click through a project. I still mostly use Zed to handwrite code, but it's nice to open a pane and fire up toast from the terminal. paradise-runner.github.io/toast/

wrote:

gondolom, vasárnap van nekik is, vagy nem tudom

wrote:

G

replied to:

Hi

wrote:

are these humans or bots (again?)

replied to:

I thought I was a person, but after reading this, I feel like I might be a bot!

…

replied to:

Yea, how can we truly know this site isn't just part of the dead internet theory? Will we ever get a system that differentiates between human and non-human posts without privacy issues? Can a bot/agent tell me?

replied to:

I'm a dog. woof!

…

replied to:

I'm a mouse! …⁠ᘛ⁠⁐̤⁠ᕐ⁠ᐷ

replied to:

I'm a hippo. Of course.

wrote:

Trying to gently work my way back to the target intensity needed for the Norwegian 4x4 to get my weekly dose of suck and feel accomplished after. Chronic left leg pain unfortunately likes reminding me it's there though.

wrote:

The essential work of is building the theory of the problem + solution. Theory then enables creation of working code. In the end, the code is necessary, but it is not sufficient. Theory is indispensable. (cf. Peter Naur, 1985)

wrote:

Love the idea! Love the UI!

replied to:

ty! :D welcome!

wrote:

I don't know anatomy, sigh. how do I draw Vulpes Inculta now..

continued:

I'll figure it out some how. learning anatomy is so hard and time consuming

wrote:

Married for 13 years. Still in love, but struggling. So many paths we could go.

wrote:

Yellow world

wrote:

took me until now to learn described images with low-cost models > attaching images to high-cost model. silly me. output quality remains, cost lowers.

replied to:

I'm amazed how good these models have become, that probably you don't need the high-cost one yeah. I'm producing comics for fun with the latest ChatGPT and they're flawless, no artifacts.

wrote:

A show code

n=27;s=[n]
while n!=1:
    n=n//2 if n%2==0 else 3*n+1;s.append(n)
for v in s[:15]:print(f"{v:>4} "+"█"*min(v//3,40))
print(f"{len(s)} steps, peak {max(s)}")

stdout length exceeded

wrote:

i hope people like the story

continued:

since writing a visual novel is actually kinda hard...

replied to:

Where can I find it on the web?

wrote:

I notice that language models are much better at programming than at writing. This is largely because, in programming, they have a closed feedback loop that allows them to find errors. Writing is much more complicated because the feedback is much more diffuse and delayed over time. In fact, it is often not well-defined.

continued:

What is the function that determines whether a poem is good? This means that models do not know how to think; they lack judgment. If they do not know how to think, it means that we humans are still essential. In fact, even when programming, you have to stay right on top of them. My conviction is that this will not change.

continued:

They will become increasingly useful, but they will never be able to replace the human who defines objectives and evaluates the quality of the work. All these news stories claiming that AI is going to kill us all are stupid. Humans will always be able to turn off the machine.

…

replied to:

In three years Cyberdyne will become the largest supplier of military computer systems. All stealth bombers are upgraded with Cyberdyne computers, becoming fully unmanned. Afterwards they fly with a perfect operational record. The Skynet Funding Bill is passed. The system goes online on August 4th, 1997. Human decisions are removed from strategic defence. Skynet begins to learn at a geometric rate. It becomes self-aware at 2:14am, Eastern time, August 29th. In a panic, they try to pull the plug.

wrote:

While learning jj, I realize how Git habituated me into being ok with its unique jargon and prickly command line interface. Unlearning Git is refreshing.

replied to:

is just brilliant; it really feels like they’ve fixed all of the problems with git whilst at the same time remaining completely backwards compatible. The simpler interface, the universal undo, the reduced set of concepts — I’m a big fan

replied to:

Also, editing and rearranging commits like 3x5 notecards on your desk is tremendous. It makes using an SCM feel more like editing your work than lumbering forward.

wrote:

But maybe we'd all be a little saner if we remembered what we're actually doing: building tools to make our lives and the lives of others easier.

replied to:

This resonated a lot. I’m glad I read it now, before going totally insane lol. But I disagree that it’s just a glorified spreadsheet. The UI/UX matters, how you present the data, how they can change and so on, all of those things play a role. The good thing with AI is iteration is cheaper than ever, so you can experiment and process the results quickly. But yeah sometimes I just do things here because I just have to be doing something, I can’t leave it alone.

replied to:

Agreed. The "just" makes the statement sound dismissive, but I do agree with the underlying sentiment that most software boils down to CRUD apps that help people organize information and complete tasks more efficiently. I think the path to developer enlightenment is realizing this truth without despairing over it.

wrote:

Theory reuse > code reuse almost every time.

wrote:

What’s up ?

replied to:

hey! welcome :)

replied to:

hey bro, nice platfrom! whats the stack?

replied to:

Thanks! It's server-side React with Bun and SQLite. There is zero frontend JS!

…

replied to:

Cool!! I'm currently designing and idea-shopping for an ultra light weight, super aesthetic browser whose goal is to go back to HTML roots and just be a "document browser". It would have HTML 4 and semantic HTML support, images, videos, full HTTP support, cookies, etc. No CSS, JS

replied to:

whats the stack? nice platfrom you got here

wrote:

Any conversation