pourover ritual :pray:
Any conversation
๐
let N=6,D0=[0,1,0,-1],D1=[1,0,-1,0],s=[],g={},d=x=y=xa=xb=ya=yb=0;
for(let n=0;n<N;n++){s=s.concat([1]).concat(s.map(x=>!x).reverse())}
for(let i=0;i<s.length;i++) {
x<xa && (xa=x);y<ya && (ya=y);x>xb && (xb=x);y>yb && (yb=y);
let t=s[i]?1:-1,e=(d+t+4)%4;
g[x]||(g[x]={});
g[x][y]=g[x][y]?"โผ":"โโโโ"[(t*(D0[d]+D0[e])>0?0:2)+(t*(D1[d]+D1[e])>0?0:1)];
x+=D0[e];y+=D1[e];d=e;
}
for(j=yb;j>=ya;j--) {
let u=""; for(i=xa;i<=xb;i++){u+=(g[i][j]||"ยท")} console.log(u);
}ยทโโโโยทยทยทยทยทยทยท
โโโโผโยทยทยทยทโโยท
โยทยทโโโโยทยทยทโโ
ยทยทยทโโผโผโยทยทยทโโ
ยทยทยทโโผโผโโโโโผโ
ยทยทยทโโผโโโผโผโโโ
ยทยทยทโโผโยทโโผโยทยท
ยทยทยทยทโโยทยทโโยทยทcode quality is about coupling.
coupling is not a technical property of the code bytes.
code acquires its meaning in contact with the cultural environment, and coupling is about meaning.
two constants with no semantic relationship are nonetheless coupled in pragmatics if they refer to the same domain concept.
if your goal is to minimise the time integral of future work, you must understand your domain: it decides which lines will need changing.
to carve up a codebase is to carve up the world.
Sigh. On the heels of , I just went into our garage to find a panel of insulation fallen to the ground, riddled with mouse droppings. ๐คข๐ซ
Cleaned it up (gloved and masked, naturally), but probably means we need to re-insulate the whole garage. Which will undoubtedly uncover a leak or some other issue. The fun never ends!
a Gemma 4 a Google tulajdona, nem tรกrol mรกs adatot, csak amirลl a gรฉpen fogom a Rezsล nevลฑ OpenClaw รผgynรถkรถt kรฉrdezgetni, helyileg azt sem itt tartja, hanem a felhลnek csรบfolt infrastruktรบrรกban, ami legvalรณszรญnลฑbben valamelyik brazรญliai esลerdลben foglal helyet vagy Finnorszรกgban
Gemma 4 is owned by Google, it doesn't store any other data, except what I'll ask the OpenClaw agent named Rezsล about on the machine, it doesn't keep it locally either, but in the infrastructure mocked as the cloud, which is most likely located in a Brazilian rainforest or in Finland
"for you" now contains the same message multiple times
โฆ
added two more screenshots to - the "root" post view is incorrect, but when reply-on-reply, information goes up-then-down.
root post view IS correct, sorry.
I understand your confusion, but that's the formatting - quoted parent is below the child post - then that post's replies follow in the discussion view. The top post is always quoting its parent below it, the different bg makes it distinct. Just need to get used to it, same on X.
There really is no other way to include the parent otherwise, you have to break the hierarchy at some point, the other form would need to omit the parent body and show a 'parent' link but we want to include its body.