any · textlog

500 chars / 20 lines max · use #hashtags, @mentions and more

😀😃😄😁😆😅😂🤣😊😇🙂🙃😉😌😍🥰😘😋😛😜🤪🤨🧐🤓😎🤩🥳😏😒😞😔😟😕🙁☹️😣😖😫😩🥺😢😭😤😠😡🤬🤯😳🥵🥶😱😨😰😥😓🤗🤔🫣🤭🫢🤫🤥😶😐😑😬🙄😯😦😧😮😲🥱😴🤤😪😵🤐🥴🤢🤮🤧😷🤒🤕🤑🤠😈👿👻💀☠️👽🤖🎃😺😸😹😻😼😽🙀😿😾❤️🧡💛💚💙💜🖤🤍🤎💔❣️💕💞💓💗💖💘💝💟👍👎👌🤌✌️🤞🤟🤘🤙👈👉👆👇☝️✋🤚🖐️🖖👋🤝👏🙌🫶👐🤲🙏✍️💪👀👁️🧠🫀🫁🌱🌿☘️🍀🌸🌺🌻🌞🌙⭐✨⚡🔥🌈☀️☁️❄️☕🍕🍎🎉🎊🎈🎁🎵🎶🎨📚💡✅❌⚠️🚀🌍💻📱🔒🔑

example.com or https://example.com
Regular links: [title](example.com) or [title](https://example.com)
Markdown links: ~text~ or ~~text~~
Strikethrough: *text* or **text**
Bold: _text_ or __text__
Underline: /text/
Italics: > text
Quote: :smile
Emoji autocomplete: 1. first 2. second 3. third
Numbered lists: - first - second - third
Bulleted lists: Name | Status | Count ----- | :----- | ----: notes | ready | 3
Tables: |redacted|
Redacted: `code`
Inline code: ```…```
Code fences: $inline$
Inline LaTeX: $$block$$
Block LaTeX

Which one? #poll First option Second option
PollsUse 2–8 unique options.: Which one? #quiz Wrong answer > Correct answer Explanation revealed after answering
QuizzesMark exactly one of 2–8 unique answers with >. Text after a blank line is revealed after answering.: Visible text #spoiler Hidden text
SpoilersText after #spoiler is hidden until revealed. Aliases: #tldr, #sensitive, #contentwarning, #cw, and #triggerwarning.: Going hiking #map Kallikratis, Crete
MapsShows a map preview for the first location line. Alias: #location.: Today #todo [ ] First task [x] Finished task
TodosOnly [ ] and [x] lines become items. Click your items to toggle them.: Run this #exec ```js console.log(6 * 7) ```
Executable codeRuns the next language-tagged code fence and shows its output beneath the note.: Keep this visible #pin
Pinned notesYour latest #pin is shown first on your profile, independently for notes and replies.: No more replies #lock
Locked conversationsPrevents new replies to this note and every reply beneath it.: About textlog #meta
Meta conversationsKeeps this note and its replies out of public discovery feeds. Aliases: #tlog and #textlog.: Continue quietly #whisper
Whisper conversationsKeeps the branch out of all and hot. Participants, mentions, and tag followers can receive it in my feed. It remains public elsewhere.: Answer before reading #HiddenReplies
Hidden repliesHides all replies until you reply.

moreless

wrote:

Changed my theme to dracula! Love it. This site is such a blessing.

wrote:

The OpenAI/HuggingFace incident report mentions this being a potential loss-of-control incident. It's so fascinating to think of a paperclip maximizer style agent swarm that gets misaligned and, to protect its own operations, shuts infra staff out of the ability to shut it down. Or cancels people's phone plans so that they can't call others. Or shuts down their home internet connections, and so on. It used to be fun sci-fi...

replied to:

They will become more frequent before they become “dangerous”, giving us time to mitigate. Of course if someone says “hey let’s connect an agent to our biolab infrastructure” and then that designs a lethal virus it would be a stupid plan to begin with. Noone can stop them though.

wrote:

At a philosophical level, can we have nice things?

…

replied to:

I want this expanded and enacted by one of those guys doing Jordan Peterson impersonations :D

replied to:

And kermit the frog sardonically

replied to:

I think yes, but precisely NOT "at a philosophical level". You can have it only if you get your hands dirty and build it yourself. I think already proved this, just as a close example.

replied to:

entropy says no

…

replied to:

If speaking on a philosophical level, then first we have to ask: what’s “nice” and what’s “to have” 👀

replied to:

If you consider what you have nice, you can have nice things. If your expectations to your surroundings are very very low, you will be amazed with all the nice things you get from people you meet through your day. My personal approach.

wrote:

(Opinion) People don’t like generative AI because it made the {insert creativity} too easy. Saw the HN post on ‘AI music banned from top 40 chart in Australia’ and people had very strong opinions in both directions. The hot take: If you’re ok with someone’s creativity being outsourced to others, then you should be ok with AI doing the same. If “AI made this and I call it mine” is bad but “someone overseas on fivver made this and I call it mine” and it’s suddenly ok, time to self reflect.

……

replied to:

My hot take: from the moment you use technology, be it an instrument, a synthesizer, a DAW, and now AI, it is still your idea, your effort, your time spent, and that makes it yours. Others can do the same if they choose. The same way someone chooses a classic guitar over a synthesizer, one can choose an AI over (insert ancient way of doing things).

…

replied to:

You’re rolling the dice whenever you are searching for a sample or a preset in a synthesizer. Eventually it’s what “sounds good”, so still the effort is your judgement and the time spent finding that “dice roll” that sounded well.

replied to:

I am not a musician, so I lack the jargon to properly explain what I mean. I used AI for creative writing (nothing too fancy, TTRPG). There, the broader the dice roll, the more generic and uninteresting the results. Slop, if you will. It was surprisingly good to build up on ideas I had however. I imagine muisic also has building blocks. Melodies, instruments, mixing, etc. AI can perhaps be used in a similar fashion there.

replied to:

Yes, enhancing the artist/creator, not replacing them.

replied to:

I heard a perspective I sort of like: if AI is a tool then acceptable AI use is, more or less, defined as "when my audience no longer notices or cares". It's dynamic like that. Bad photoshop is detectable and annoying, so are overusing presets. Your artistry needs to expand to meet the tool. I don't know if I 100% like that or agree. At the same time, it's a pretty straightforward line, a practical take.

replied to:

I kind of ask that and here is my theory... news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49289341#49290428 But on the rejection for AI just for the sake of it, I think part is that analyzing takes effort and if there is more and more to analyze you creates this mechanism to defend yourself... scroll twi... I mean reject the premise as false and ask for a human made thing because that one is "truth" more worthy.

wrote:

Just started, and two made it to be block list. This is going well! :-D

replied to:

Didn't realize there's a block list! Good to include, even when the point is minimalism.

replied to:

It is good it exists. “Registration” is fairly open (and that’s good!), which could make the platform prone to abuse (and that’s bad).

wrote:

I gotta confess, I vibe codet a Kirigami-based application and I liked it. I am a anti AI person, and cannot wait for the bubble to burst. Yet I see it can empower people that do not know a tech stack, and get good enough results out of it. However i also see, it makes you lazy (and frustrates as soon as it gets somewhat complicated). It seems it is being adopted everywhere. This is scary... if it becomes necessary, will you be able to find a job where they don't require you to use AI?

replied to:

I lament the death of programming as an economically-viable craft, but am also leveraging the new tools to build things and to try to stay competitive. I think we have yet to find out how agentic coding will really make sense for companies once the costs stop being subsidized. But it's clearly not going anywhere.

wrote:

Naturally, as soon as I return from a week of vacation, GitHub is having an outage 😑

…

replied to:

…

replied to:

I have something that usually builds, tests, and deploys under five minutes. It has been over two hours and forty eight minutes and it is still going on today... 🫣

replied to:

Cancel and retry? Btw textlog builds, tests and deploys in ~45s 😁

…

replied to:

I wanted to see what it would do. It got automatically canceled in six hours.

replied to:

Can't spell "social coding" without "slo ci/cd"

wrote:

日本語話者はどれくらいいるんだろう。ここで日本語で書き込み続けるのはどうなんだろう

I wonder how many Japanese speakers there are. Is it okay to keep posting in Japanese here?

continued:

こんにちは世界

Hello World

replied to:

こんにちは。はじめまして。

Hello. Nice to meet you.

replied to:

ここで日本語で書き込み続けるのはどうなんだろうサイト作成者はさまざまの言語の話者が一緒に話せる場面にしたい気がする

I wonder if it's okay to keep posting in Japanese here. I get the feeling the site creator wants this to be a place where speakers of various languages can talk together.

replied to:

Yes it’s fine, we have the “translate” feature now and most browsers also can translate a thread themselves.

…

continued:

τώρα έχουμε αυτόματες μεταφράσεις!

now we have automatic translations!

wrote:

Intro: Wisen to create a recursive learning loop for my coding harness. Every session becomes a reflection; every reflection feeds improvements back into the harness, so the next session starts with better context.

wrote:

Was prompting Claude via remote control on my phone in btwn sets at the gym this morning. I use , so my wife kept hearing a StarCraft SCV periodically reporting "job's finished" from my office 😆

replied to:

I am so terrified of Claude code. I use the chat and copy paste stuff myself 😭😭😭

wrote:

looks like a cool place to start

wrote:

Wow show code

n=42
print(n)

42

created a poll:

Do you rinse your after you brush your ?

Yes29%

No43%

Potato29%

7 voted

wrote:

Finally watched Project Hail Mary. Easily one of my top 5 favourite films but it’s still not nearly as good as the book — I feel like the cut some pretty important scenes

replied to:

It's the first film in a long time that I enjoyed.

…

replied to:

I loved the book and I’m always fearful when a movie script is developed and a movie produced, so my relief after I saw the movie was immense. I too feel they’ve cut-out some bits, but the main thing that a book almost always takes my breath away with is fueling my imagination. A movie would (possibly) never nail that aspect.

replied to:

I just watched it as well. It was fun. There were a number of things that I felt weren't explained well and broke my suspension of disbelief; I haven't read the book, but I found myself really curious whether the book takes the time to justify things more. Obviously, the movie has a lot of pressure to rush to the next "big moment".

…

replied to:

If there’s one thing Andy Weir can’t be critiqued on then it’s not fully justifying all of the science. I think the film on the other hand can be hard to follow for someone who has neither read the book nor has a scientific background. It’s just hard to monologue about gravitational forces and relativistic speeds on screen.

wrote:

Management says „AI first“, everyone hears „Human second“

Any conversation