Denshattack! - easily gets my OST of the year vote. Absolute pleasure to both listen to and play.
Any conversation
I have a toddler.
I come home from work, cook, feed, clean, wash up. We read stories and play. I put him to bed.
Then I put something on the television and my wife and I scroll on our phones until she goes to bed.
I am not so careless with the little free time I have.
I continue to scroll until about 1 am.
The next morning I do it again.
On the weekends, I get to drink wine.
I find myself building bespoke tooling for my own and workflows these days, not only because of the obvious reason of software being so much cheaper to build, but also because there are SO MANY options for solving any given problem that it feels impossible to evaluate all of them.
If it's not a crucial piece of tech for a work problem then it often feels like paving my own way is both cheaper mentally (kind of amazing that's true these days) and probably a better fit.
It will become increasingly harder to find niche markets for software when those people can just build it themselves exactly how they want it. In the end, people want to accomplish tasks, and the AI is going to be building the software on-the-fly exactly for that task, why do we need generic software that may or may not be a fit?
Yeah. It makes me think that protocols for exchanging data between apps will become even more important in that landscape. But maybe, not - maybe each exchange is another bespoke AI-driven implementation?
Protocols, infrastructure, containers, those kinds of things. I was actually playing around with an idea for a minimal markup language + runtime that can be utilized by AI to spin up apps more easily, and brainstorming it with ChatGPT, I have a feeling something like that will appear soon to complement MCP.
Overvalued, maybe. Extremely valuable, yes, though.
For sure. We're well past the point of being able to reasonably claim that the tools have no practical use.
But I share the article's skepticism that LLM-based AI will "produce a fully automated drop-in replacement for most knowledge workers". Which it at this point has to in order to justify these companies' stupendous valuations.
Tomorrow no but there will always be the โhopeโ which is enough for the next 20 years before giving up. Which meanwhile would be replacing larger and larger chunks of the workforce so it wonโt really matter, weโll be adjusting our lives around it as well so we meet in the middle.
Tesla has been overvalued for over a decade with the promise of โfully autonomous carsโ and itโs still not losing its value, despite not meeting that (and probably never will, as the computation necessary to achieve it is bounded by physics).
I never have enough time but Iโd love to do a bit more recreational programming with esoterical languages like kitten, , and . AoC and Project Euler are good because they just require an answer but thereโs also loads of simple puzzles online that rely on being able to submit the code in common languages. Iโve been wondering, however, if I could use an LLM to take those problems and create a verification harness for any language I like.
โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โขโฃโฃโ โ โข โ โขนโขณโขโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โกคโ โกโ โฃตโ โ โ โกโขธโ โขธโ โกโ โ โ โ โ โขโกดโ โ โกงโฃโฃโกโ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โกฐโ โ โขฐโ โ โกโ โ โขฐโ โกโ โกโกโกโ โ โ โกฐโกฑโกโ โกโ โกโ โขโ โ โ คโกโ โ โ โ โ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โ โ โขโกโขโ โขโ โ โขโ โ ธโกโ โ โกโกโ โกโ โกโ โ โกฐโขกโกฑโ โกโขโ โขโขดโ โ โ โ โฃโกโกโ โ โ โ โ
โ โ โ โ โ โ โกโ โ นโฃฆโ โขโ โ โกโ โ ฑโ โ โขฐโขโ โขโขธโกโ โข โขโขงโ โกฐโขโ โข โกพโ โ โ โก โ โก โ โ โฃโ โ โ
even vanguard supports passkeys now
investor.vanguard.com/โฆ/trust-security
I think yes, but precisely NOT "at a philosophical level". You can have it only if you get your hands dirty and build it yourself. I think @stagasprofilefollow
creative technologist
creator of textlog already proved this, just as a close example.
creative technologist
creator of textlog already proved this, just as a close example.