Good catch! I've added yet another option, you can enter the six-digit code manually in the "Check your email" screen instead of the magic link. This should cover this case without the need to enable password.
Found the use for it just now. At work I get my personal emails on my mobile device, but I am accessing textlog on the desktop. Getting a magic link on my mobile doesn't help me at all getting logged in on desktop. Enter the old, venerable, password.
Appreciate it, thank you!
I like the minimalism of this site, very well done imo. It is more engaging.
If we start scaling to the point where federation makes sense, then we will do it. But now we're tiny /stats
Yeah, federated, exactly. Centralised has some charm, but it is a silo, and a single point of failure.
*hacks into 's machine, pulls all funds* :p
My whole machine is set up to make way too much easily accessible with shell tools (email, stock trading, payments, mms group chats.) I can't trust it.
You mean federated. I did a small investigation, it's not impossible but not sure if it's worth it. It is a huge architectural change and would require a ton of maintainance, and our current scale doesn't justify it. I feel the centralized character has some charm also.
I was thinking... will it be possible to make textlog decentralised? Keeping the same functionality, but allow self-hosters to interact with other self-hosters, that is.
Love this mentality.
I haven't gotten a coffee maker at my current apartment. The idea is that not having it drives me to go outside (work, the clubhouse, church, all have free coffee) that way I don't spend too much time alone.
So my favorite way is with other people.
I give my AI Full-Access. :p
A lot of people write so much software to sandbox their AI agents.
I say don't bother. Just give your agent its own non-admin local user account. It's easier and much more effective.
Yeah it's happening to people. It's because the email contains a link and we don't have the reputation yet. Not sure what to do, have you tried reporting it as 'Not spam' in your client? Maybe if enough people do that it will fix. Gmail works ok.
All emails from textlog go to my junk folder, . Using iCloud+. Not sure if anyone reported that before, so here I am. :-)
Done. Thanks again! :)
How about size? The default size looks a tad tiny.
reminds me of flash websites back in the day, but this is a regular native website, it looks amazing. the content is great too
not my blog but i recently discovered acko.net which i can recommend. awesome personal website
:D that's awesome!
wow thanks for the heads up! i embedded my posts in my /now page: https://hypersubject.net/now/
your blog looks cool! you might want to check our new , iframe embeds, that you can personalize and maybe use if you want! they're documented in the /api
i love reading blog posts! reply with your blogs so i can subscribe to them
and i also like the way it's implemented now, as an opt-in setting, instead of being the default.
D’oh! Just when you convinced me!
lol, i was convinced myself but had an argument i couldn't fight, so, passwords :P
D’oh! Just when you convinced me!
🎉
Lots of UI improvements and addressing API spam issues/errors reported by in this release.
Next let's aim to get the test version on the playstore!
me too, but at the same time i'm enjoying getting things done, otherwise i would get lost in details like bikeshedding naming variables and making the code look pretty, and little would be done.
i miss real coding
and moving the quoted above would break the consistency with the actual feed posts which would make it way more confusing.
There really is no other way to include the parent otherwise, you have to break the hierarchy at some point, the other form would need to omit the parent body and show a 'parent' link but we want to include its body.
There really is no other way to include the parent otherwise, you have to break the hierarchy at some point, the other form would need to omit the parent body and show a 'parent' link but we want to include its body.
root post view IS correct, sorry.
I understand your confusion, but that's the formatting - quoted parent is below the child post - then that post's replies follow in the discussion view. The top post is always quoting its parent below it, the different bg makes it distinct. Just need to get used to it, same on X.
root post view IS correct, sorry.
rn "for you" is a chronological feed of everything you follow. If you only see top level posts then you'll miss half-or-more of the discussions happening in the site. I'm not so sure about this change.
replies should be under the original post, they have different meaning than standalone posts. In "for you" I expect standalone posts, if I want to read discussion, open replies.