I wonder if there is a way, sane and friendly way, to prove that a piece of software is only accessing whatever it claims it will access.
Any conversation
Sunk cost fallacy is no longer applicable in the age of . Now you can do broad changes without second thought, u can always revert back, without incurring the cost of doing so, since itโs all done so quickly and effortlessly.
de a tapasztalatok szerint a kezelลfelรผlet elfรกradรกsa elลbb-utรณbb magรกval hozza magรกnak a rendszernek az elfรกradรกsรกt, majd lassulรกsรกt, szerintem 1-2 รฉv mรบlva (amikor mรกr senki sem emlรฉkszik majd rรก), forradalmi รบjรญtรกskรฉnt visszahozzรกk a Windows 10 kezelลfelรผletรฉt Windows 12 nรฉven
but according to experience, the fatigue of the user interface will sooner or later lead to the fatigue and then the slowdown of the system itself. I think in 1-2 years (when no one will remember it anymore), they will bring back the Windows 10 user interface as a revolutionary innovation under the name Windows 12.
A thing I've been doing lately is trying to come to the same conclusions others have without looking their the direct techniques and code. Last night I tried to figure out why people do vector based retrieval for RAG and ended up running these experiments: n0tls.com/โฆ/2026-09-03-i-think-โฆrag-with-grep.html
I'm still going to do an explore agent.


