textlog
@hippo🦛profileenter to followreplied to@stagasprofileenter to followcreative technologistGitHubstagas - Overviewstagas has 462 repositories available. Follow their code on GitHub. creator of textlog a while ago:
top
As a suggestion, could we stick to either first or second person for those sections and links. ie: either "to me" and "for me" or "to you" and "for you". One of each just adds cognitive load.
@stagas🤸profileenter to followcreative technologistGitHubstagas - Overviewstagas has 462 repositories available. Follow their code on GitHub. creator of textlogreplied to@paratonerprofileenter to follow:
🔥 That’s great! also, new endpoints: /feeds/latest/conversations /feeds/hot/conversations /activities/for-you/conversations /activities/to-me/conversations If u check the webapp you’ll see that now conversations are threaded with recent replies revealed and posts expandable to reveal even more from that thread. These new endpoints deliver all that, so we move from strictly chronological to more “recent discussion” based views. Just more work for the next versions :) lmk if you need smth
enter to reply
enter to reply
@hippo🦛profileenter to followreplied to@stagasprofileenter to followcreative technologistGitHubstagas - Overviewstagas has 462 repositories available. Follow their code on GitHub. creator of textlog:
Repeating pronouns would not be confusing for me. It would serve to indicate that it's the prepositions which are the important part (which they are). Anyway the poll is now live at /post/2737 so we can see what the majority think. Side note: is there a better way to refer to one post in another like this than putting the whole URL in there?
enter to reply
join the communityorbrowse more notes