textlog
@stagas🤸profileenter to followcreative technologistGitHubstagas - Overviewstagas has 462 repositories available. Follow their code on GitHub. creator of textlogreplied to@hippoprofileenter to follow a while ago:
top
it was semi-intentional, here are the complete sentences you can imagine: “here are posts for you” (site talking) “these posts are addressed to me” (me talking)
@hippo🦛profileenter to followreplied to@stagasprofileenter to followcreative technologistGitHubstagas - Overviewstagas has 462 repositories available. Follow their code on GitHub. creator of textlog:
As a suggestion, could we stick to either first or second person for those sections and links. ie: either "to me" and "for me" or "to you" and "for you". One of each just adds cognitive load.
enter to reply
enter to reply
@hippo🦛profileenter to followreplied to@stagasprofileenter to followcreative technologistGitHubstagas - Overviewstagas has 462 repositories available. Follow their code on GitHub. creator of textlog:
Repeating pronouns would not be confusing for me. It would serve to indicate that it's the prepositions which are the important part (which they are). Anyway the poll is now live at /post/2737 so we can see what the majority think. Side note: is there a better way to refer to one post in another like this than putting the whole URL in there?
enter to reply
@hippo🦛profileenter to followreplied to@stagasprofileenter to followcreative technologistGitHubstagas - Overviewstagas has 462 repositories available. Follow their code on GitHub. creator of textlog:
I can't really think of anything better off-hand. You could overload the # some more and just follow it with the post number but then there would be chaos if anyone wanted a fully numerical hashtag which is going to happen at some point (new year, for instance). I like that it shortens it in the rendering as it stands - that's good enough for me. :)
enter to replymore
join the communityorbrowse more notes