wrote:
noo i dont like emojiis
#meta
#textlog, #tlog
continued:
the same applies for tags and β they are aliases for
wrote:Added#metatag β use it whenever you want to talk about the site itself, and these posts will not show up inall,anyor the postβs page. Only those that follow the tag or the person will see these posts inmy feedor in post pages. This is to keep the site clear of meta discussions which dominated a lot at this early stage and I think were annoying to many people. So this is the last meta without the#metatag youβll see unless u follow. Iβll try to tag every post I find.
wrote:
We now have ! You know that book or movie someone mentioned? Now you can bookmark that post by the bottom right action in the postβs page and then you can find these bookmarked posts from the bookmarks nav menu item. These are visible only to you and there is no gamification, the author doesnβt see that youβve bookmarked their post. Enjoy!
created a poll:
Iβve changed the tabs. βSome other combinationβ was very high in the previous poll and I wanted to keep the labels short so they fit on mobile, so βfollowingβ and βinboxβ wouldnβt fit along with βrandomβ and βlatestβ.
So⦠do you like the tabs now?
Yes, keep βem100%
No, I have another suggestion0%
I donβt care0%
wrote:
, a little report for you.
The addition of the recent activity bit on profile view does not work well when you have a description in your profile. On mobile when not on landscape mode the bio renders vertically, one character per line. On landscape mode it works fine.
Tested on Firefox for Android. Not sure if on other browsers it is more graceful.
wrote:
I got weirdly rate limited for one hour and the experience was extremely odd. No site link worked. None. I was trying to reply and halfway I wanted to fact check something, copied my half finished message and went back a page, checked and went ahead to click reply or something and boom! Rate limited.
wrote:
Tweaked the moderation settings, some posts may appear moderated behind a consent screen. If you want to always see those posts and not have to click-to-show you can enable that setting under βShow moderated contentβ.
If a legitimate post you make gets moderated it will also now tell you why and the score, so you can report it here and we can relax the settings more and put that also behind a consent screen instead of rejecting it.
wrote:
Tweaked timelines to favor readability over strictly chronological ordering. This means sometimes a recent reply can resurrect an older post making it look like it is recent, but itβs only meant to bring context. The feeds also now collapse discussions with >1 replies that have been read, so you have to expand to read them again. Unreads will expand anyway. Letβs see how this goes for a couple of days.
wrote:
ΞΏΞΉ ΟημΡιΟΟΞ΅ΞΉΟ ΞΌΞ΅ΟΞ±ΟΟά΢ονΟΞ±ΞΉ Ξ±Ο
ΟΟΞΌΞ±ΟΞ± ΟΟΟΞ± ΞΏΟΟΟΞ΅ ΞΌΟΞΏΟΡίΟΞ΅ Ξ½Ξ± μιλάΟΞ΅ ΟΟΞ· Ξ³Ξ»ΟΟΟΞ± ΟΞ±Ο ΞΊΞ±ΞΉ ΟΞΏ κΡίμΡνο ΞΈΞ± ΞΌΞ΅ΟΞ±ΟΟΞ±ΟΟΡί Ξ±Ο
ΟΟΞΌΞ±ΟΞ± ΟΟΞ± αγγλικά!
notes are now automatically translated so you can speak in your language and the text will be automatically translated into English!
wrote:
possible bug or odd behaviour: The past few times Iβve visited over the past 24 hours, my βfor youβ had a count of 1 or 2 and it made sense. This evening, my βfor youβ count is in the 800s. Iβm only following two tags and the only other change is that Iβm following you. As I type this out, that is probably it? Perhaps tag and user tabs should be separate? Iβve given this all of 23 seconds of thought, but itβs quite overwhelming.
wrote:
Implemented
#whisper modifier tag. Keeps that note and every reply beneath it out of /latest and /hot. If used on a reply, only its direct parent starts in the conversation; people who reply or are mentioned inside the whisper branch join it. Followers of tags in the whisper branch also receive it in for you. The conversation remains public on profiles, tag pages, threads, and permalinks. Not for private messages. Itβs simply a way to keep a conversation out of peopleβs normal feeds. wrote:
Crossed the milestone! All because of I made and a repost on Hacker News. More than 100 users signed up. Feels great!
wrote:
I noticed that when I changed my handle, it redirects the old handle to my new handle. Will this always be the case?
How are old mentions handled in comments? Also, what is to stop someone from changing their handle thousands of times to βsquatβ on handles? I see thereβs a limit 2 handles per month you can create. Does the handle change count toward that?
replied to:
I think this is trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist on this platform. I would predict that any sense of "timelessness" will come from 's plaintext-centricity and feature minimalism, not a lack of timestamps.
continued:I want to avoid the βrushβ of living on the edge all the time. Want to slow things down, put some thought, make browsing a profile look like reading oneβs thoughts like a book. To feel timeless.
continued:
The meeting went well and all the topics we discussed were on a positive direction for ! Main point is we are now a legal entity and we can receive funds and βmore importantlyβ grants, in order to keep this project alive and healthy. Our main goal is now growing the site.
continued:On a call with them in about an hour to learn details. Will share.
continued:
Ran out of issues to work on, again. I hate it when this happens. Moving too fast with has this disadvantage, no time to think ahead. Any ideas?
continued:and I thought the site was finished and I had nothing else to add when I 'ed it. How naive. I've done so much work since then and every day is full of issues to work on.
wrote:
535 commits, in ~15 days by a single person. Using multiplies productivity 20β30 times, at least. Very thankful for this technology. It has truly spread my wings.