textlog
โ€ฆ
๐Ÿคธprofilefollowcreative technologist creator of textlogreplied toprofilefollowcoder, reader, guitarist, seeker, builder.:
It doesnโ€™t run on every post, you run it yourself via more โ†’ autotag, and itโ€™s safe, it doesnโ€™t have access to anything other than the post content and we simply use its response. Or do you have any other case in mind?
profilefollowwrote:
@stagasprofilefollowcreative technologist creator of textlog can we have a feed that is chronological but parent posts only? I guess โ€œallโ€ is the closest but it moves posts to the top also based on new comments. But if I wasnโ€™t interested in a post to begin with, comments wonโ€™t change that and it does not need to be resurfaced #metanotesfollow
profilefollowcoder, reader, guitarist, seeker, builder.wrote:
Have been reading the book: The Wise Heart by Dr Jack Kornfield. Profound and inspiring. Highly recommend.
profilefollowcoder, reader, guitarist, seeker, builder.continued:
There are two kinds of suffering. One which you run from, and it follows you everywhere. And there is suffering you face directly, and in doing so become free. - Ajahn Chah So damn insightful.
โ€ฆ
profilefollowcoder, reader, guitarist, seeker, builder.replied to๐Ÿฆ›profilefollowStrictly no LLMs. No exceptions.:
1. "my textlog" (for the textlogs i should read) -- analogous to "wall" (my wall of text). 2. "inbox" (messages & notifications directly sent to me)
profilefollow"Beware those that would deny you access to information, for in their heart they dream themselves your master." โ€” Sid Meyersreplied to๐Ÿฆ›profilefollowStrictly no LLMs. No exceptions.:
What the "for you" means? Often I find things there, but, why are they "for me"? What's the criteria? Same for "to me". Are "to me" replies to my notes, or comments, or are they something else? I will start by defining what exactly are those two, before getting into further weeds.
@ โ†’ smallest token, visited less often than the rest, very visible when it has a counter that you need to pay attention to (someone interacted with you) my feed โ†’ largest token, this is where you should be spending your time mostly. right now itโ€™s everything youโ€™re following, but in the future might be enriched, so itโ€™s a feed of information, my feed of information hot โ†’ obvious, unambiguous all โ†’ simply everything thatโ€™s posted. clearly communicated.
All have different dimensions & shapes. for you -> personalization -> feed / my feed / my textlog / >_ (branded) for me -> directionality -> mentions / my mentions / @me @ is also directionality signifier hot -> popularity -> hot all -> firehose/chronology -> latest, tho it does create a endo-hit Goofy shorthand experiments (maybe superscripts?): >_ @me !hot *all or: >_ @ ! *
As long as we're doing this, may I put forth that the "hot" tab runs counter to the principle that removing view counts and timestamps seemed to embody? I'd rather have a "random" tab than a hot. I liked your impulse to design around dopamine rather than at it.
Iโ€™ve given a lot of thought about that. My thinking was to keep some older nice posts a bit more alive to keep the discussion going. And it works to a percentage. But as it is now with the new conversation views it overlaps a lot with โ€œlatestโ€ as the active conversations get bumped to the top anyway, so the current โ€œhotโ€ topics are in latestโ€™s first page naturally. So I might refactor the algorithm a bit to favor top level posts. I think itโ€™s worth it, new users especially discover posts there..
Furthermore, writing again to your surfaced spaced repetition would, as a side-effect, bubble up to the all & potentially hot feeds making new content visible to others. It's not a fully shaped or realized concept. Just dreaming up other ideas.
join the communityorbrowse more notes