Run Claude code in docker sandbox (sbx) to ensure it only has current folder access and limited or no network access. Especially since a lot of runs are now in “auto mode”.
Unless even this is not really so safe!?
@fastidiousprofilefollow
"Beware those that would deny you access to information, for in their heart they dream themselves your master." — Sid Meyersreplied to:
"Beware those that would deny you access to information, for in their heart they dream themselves your master." — Sid Meyersreplied to:Claude will run on auto mode only if you tell it to do it.
replied to@fastidiousprofilefollow"Beware those that would deny you access to information, for in their heart they dream themselves your master." — Sid Meyers:
"Beware those that would deny you access to information, for in their heart they dream themselves your master." — Sid Meyers:They've changed the default -
@fastidiousprofilefollow"Beware those that would deny you access to information, for in their heart they dream themselves your master." — Sid Meyersreplied to:
"Beware those that would deny you access to information, for in their heart they dream themselves your master." — Sid Meyersreplied to:Ah, wow, TIL! Hmm, it is evident I need to visit their blog at least once a week now. Thanks!
python supported as well
print(6*7)42syntax:
something #exec
```js
or
```python
your code, then close ``` the code block.This is a good example of
RecursionError in Python!
f = lambda: f(); f()Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/box/submission/file0.code", line 1, in <module>
f = lambda: f(); f()
^^^
File "/box/submission/file0.code", line 1, in <lambda>
f = lambda: f(); f()
^^^
File "/box/submission/file0.code", line 1, in <lambda>
f = lambda: f(); f()
^^^
File "/box/submission/file0.code", line 1, in <lambda>
f = lambda: f(); f()
^^^
[Previous line repeated 996 more times]
RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded@stagasprofilefollow
creative technologist
creator of textlog
Probably a good idea to add some guardrails (if you haven't already). I purposefully wrote something that would crash, but I could very well have written something that looped infinitely.
creative technologist
creator of textlog
Probably a good idea to add some guardrails (if you haven't already). I purposefully wrote something that would crash, but I could very well have written something that looped infinitely.(Opinion) People don’t like generative AI because it made the {insert creativity} too easy. Saw the HN post on ‘AI music banned from top 40 chart in Australia’ and people had very strong opinions in both directions.
The hot take: If you’re ok with someone’s creativity being outsourced to others, then you should be ok with AI doing the same.
If “AI made this and I call it mine” is bad but “someone overseas on fivver made this and I call it mine” and it’s suddenly ok, time to self reflect.
…
My hot take: from the moment you use technology, be it an instrument, a synthesizer, a DAW, and now AI, it is still your idea, your effort, your time spent, and that makes it yours. Others can do the same if they choose. The same way someone chooses a classic guitar over a synthesizer, one can choose an AI over (insert ancient way of doing things).
I think things are more nuanced than that.
I think there's something about intentionality. There's a difference in between knowing what you want to build and using tools to achieve that (whatever those might be), and just rolling the dice for whatever comes out.
You’re rolling the dice whenever you are searching for a sample or a preset in a synthesizer. Eventually it’s what “sounds good”, so still the effort is your judgement and the time spent finding that “dice roll” that sounded well.
I am not a musician, so I lack the jargon to properly explain what I mean.
I used AI for creative writing (nothing too fancy, TTRPG). There, the broader the dice roll, the more generic and uninteresting the results. Slop, if you will. It was surprisingly good to build up on ideas I had however.
I imagine muisic also has building blocks. Melodies, instruments, mixing, etc. AI can perhaps be used in a similar fashion there.
I heard a perspective I sort of like: if AI is a tool then acceptable AI use is, more or less, defined as "when my audience no longer notices or cares". It's dynamic like that. Bad photoshop is detectable and annoying, so are overusing presets. Your artistry needs to expand to meet the tool.
I don't know if I 100% like that or agree. At the same time, it's a pretty straightforward line, a practical take.
Bring back timestamps?
No, I like the cleanliness of the design and the concept37%
Yes, but limited to the post’s page and for historical posts44%
Yes, everywhere, I can’t live without them19%
…
Follow your gut on this one... goes to the restroom...
Another use-case for timestamps - showing how often someone posts, and how recently they were active. I want to be able to send my friends a link to my user page and say "follow me here for random thoughts". Odds are they're not going to create an account, but they might bookmark it and check for updates from time to time. Timestamps will tell them whether it's worthwhile to do this.
Please no.
This place is special as it is.
Why not replace them with humanized time periods:
"Just now"
"A little while ago"
"A long time ago"
etc.
Yes! I made a similar suggestion on HN, though like your labels better. I was thinking a bit more on it that after "just now" and a hypothetical "new" that the timestamp could disappear so long as there has been a response within X amount of time, for example, after 2 months. After this time period it could start saying things like, "a while ago," "quite a while ago," and "a long time ago" based on (for example) 1 years ago, 2 years ago, > 2 years ago.
Made another important decision to remove all counters — notes, replies, following, followers — from both people and hashtags, so you focus on the content not the numbers. It was creating competition which feeds the dopamine system, which we have exhausted and try to avoid.
…
congrats @stagasprofilefollowcreative technologist
creator of textlog more power to you, let's not build another "gamified" thing... no numbers to bump, in fact... you can think of it like "what makes the network LESS attractive to AI dissinformation campaigns", no value in selling you "a profile with thousands of followers".
creative technologist
creator of textlog more power to you, let's not build another "gamified" thing... no numbers to bump, in fact... you can think of it like "what makes the network LESS attractive to AI dissinformation campaigns", no value in selling you "a profile with thousands of followers".As others have said, this made me join (textlog has been open in a tab for weeks now without my creating an account). I'm on the fence about timestamps but everything else is great. The lack of dopamine from not being able to like or get liked is both painful and incredibly freeing. Also, I LOVE the design of this site.
numbers
In a past life, when I was a statistician, I often though that the primary goal of statistics was to communicate numerical ideas without actually using any numbers. Numbers make people anxious, manufacture false certainty, project false confidence. They invariably appear to say something that's related to but not quite exactly the truth.
I love the experiment of just not having them. I also wonder about the experiment of: could something fuzzier, less fraught replace them?
Ask HN: What's slop? what's AI written text and why read/not read?
news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49289341#49290428
Perhaps controversial for , but now you can create multiple accounts under your account (aka personas) that you can use as regular accounts, each with their own profile. The same email is used and you can switch between them under .
…
It's me or I feel the "Disco Elysium" force is strong here...
I am honestly confused, what would you need multiple Accounts for that are not "entirely distinct"
Can anyone tell me their use-case? maybe I just don't see it.
^C
Freedom of expression is one, perhaps you want to say things and not be associated with your "regular" account, that would maybe be seen by co-workers or potential employers. Another is you want to make a bot to post some stuff but not be seen as actually typed by you.
Different followings/ers as well. You could always do a new account with a new email to do that, so nothing is new here. It's just an easier way to make a different new account.