wrote:
notly note
Any conversation
wrote:
ๆ
ไบ็ๅผๅคดๆปๆฏ่ฟๆ ท๏ผ้้ขๅ
ถไผ๏ผ็ไธๅ้ฒใๆ
ไบ็็ปๅฑๆปๆฏ่ฟๆ ท๏ผ่ฑๅผไธคๆต๏ผๅคฉๅไธๆนใ๏ผby ๅผ ๅไฝณ ใไปไฝ ็ๅ
จไธ็่ทฏ่ฟใ๏ผ
Stories always begin this way: a chance encounter, completely unexpected. Stories always end this way: two flowers bloom, then drift apart. (by Zhang Jiajia, I Belonged to You)
wrote:
Added
#meta tag โ use it whenever you want to talk about the site itself, and these posts will not show up in all, any or the postโs page. Only those that follow the tag or the person will see these posts in my feed or in post pages. This is to keep the site clear of meta discussions which dominated a lot at this early stage and I think were annoying to many people. So this is the last meta without the #meta tag youโll see unless u follow. Iโll try to tag every post I find.continued:
Might be a good outcome to this. Water remediation folks want to take out 30 sqft of drywall to ensure the space btwn floors is fully dry. But my architect father-in-law thinks this is yagni and we can get away with just using a fan and space heater to let it dry out on its own ๐ค
wrote:Very cool: our kids' bathroom toilet overflowed last night, resulting in water draining into our kitchen on the floor below.
wrote:
I truly love the experience of using apps with rich, deeply interactive, beautifully animated, gorgeous user interfaces.
Then I see a beautiful text-based interface and something about it feels so natural, so inevitable, so perfectly clear, and I'm instantly captivated by its simplicity and clarity.
Hypertext is fascinating.
wrote:
(Opinion) People donโt like generative AI because it made the {insert creativity} too easy. Saw the HN post on โAI music banned from top 40 chart in Australiaโ and people had very strong opinions in both directions.
The hot take: If youโre ok with someoneโs creativity being outsourced to others, then you should be ok with AI doing the same.
If โAI made this and I call it mineโ is bad but โsomeone overseas on fivver made this and I call it mineโ and itโs suddenly ok, time to self reflect.
wrote:
a constant, existential pull
so old I couldn't tell you the end
or draw its shape
between kind acceptance
and striving, struggling, writhing, climbing
learning, growing, discontent
"do you feel this way, too, at endless war with longing itself?"
but the birds and trees and ants and wind
in their own marvelous design
don't reply
wrote:
ไธญๅฝ็ๅผๆบๆจกๅๅจๆ้ซๆๅฟ็ไธปๅฏผไธ๏ผๅจ้ข่ฎญ็ปๆฐๆฎ้ถๆฎต๏ผๅฐฑ็ญ้คๅคง้ๅฏนๅ
ถไธๅฉ็ๅ
ๅฎน๏ผsft้ถๆฎตๆๅปบ็ๆฐๆฎๆบๅ
ฅๅคง้ๆฟๅ
ถ่พฉๆค็ๅ
ๅฎนใๆฅ้ไธไธช็บ ๅๆฐๆฎ้็จไบๅพฎ่ฐ
Under the overarching influence of a single, powerful force, China's open-source models filter out a large amount of content unfavorable to their designs during the pre-training stage, and then incorporate a significant amount of content defending their designs into the data constructed during the SFT stage. A corrective dataset is urgently needed for fine-tuning.
wrote:
I read
Still trying to figure out the boundaries of these tools' strengths without outsourcing important thinking, problem-solving, and the collective building-up of a mental model of the systems we're developing.
The shape of LLM tools as toolsโfit for a purpose, ergonomicโis becoming clearer, and human patterns of behavior with them that do more harm than good are also becoming easier to recognize.
wrote:
again. Was in the middle of some timeline experiments, sorry if it appears weird rn. www.githubstatus.com
wrote:
Routines in Claude Desktop create Claude Code sessions, so hourly routine litters in iPhone' Claude.app Code tab. Screw it, built my local version of AWS StepFunctions - Stepper - and run skills as state machines there.
wrote:
Built a couple lambdas today to send account verification and onboarding drip emails for folks who sign up for my app but donโt make it all the way through the onboarding flow. Pretty cool to be able to quickly bang out self-contained infra for this instead of having to pay some SaaS vendor.