wrote:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.
Any conversation
wrote:
Whatโs the difference between a script-kiddy and a real ? Abstraction. You can program your whole life without learning how to meaningfully abstract problems into simpler pieces that TRULY make the problem easier to understand.
Iโm not talking about design patterns or vs . These tools can help. But to really simplify something for others, you need an intellectual empathy that many simply never figure out.
wrote:
Looks like you-know-who has finally come for nitter. :-(
nitter.net
wrote:
spiral
for(y=-5;y<5;y++){
s=""
for(x=-10;x<10;x++){
r=Math.hypot(x/2,y);a=Math.atan2(y,x/2);s+=" .:*#โ"[((r+a*2)%5+5)%5|0]
}
console.log(s)
}::.........:::***##
.. ...::**##
######## ..::**#
###********# ..::*#
#**:::...::*# ..:**#
. ##**::. ..::**##
##**:.. #*::***##
##**:.. ######
. ##**::... ...
. ##***:::......:::wrote:
they too have every incentive to exaggerate because they are selling safety and/or books on the topic. I donโt believe we wonโt see it coming. Any issues that will manifest will be very visible and weโll have plenty of time to mitigate their impact.
replied to:i dont think its all talk, these are smart people that have been in ai since the 2000s, and they raise good points. current incentive structures are very dangerous long term
wrote:
I don't see much point in trying to build software at a "higher level", like whole products and services. I'm going to go down low and train myself on the fundamentals. Hopefully in time I'll be able to contribute to the foundational bits.
You're right, it does get exhausting. At some point you just want to rebuild everything, which is not possible.
replied to:NIH syndrome? I am guilty of it too. I love implementing things from scratch, you learn a lot by doing so and you get to own the codebase end-to-end, so no surprises and fighting around othersโ choices. It can get exhausting too though, in the end I succumb to using off-the-shelf components because my primary goals move at a higher level.
wrote:
๐
let N=6,D0=[0,1,0,-1],D1=[1,0,-1,0],s=[],g={},d=x=y=xa=xb=ya=yb=0;
for(let n=0;n<N;n++){s=s.concat([1]).concat(s.map(x=>!x).reverse())}
for(let i=0;i<s.length;i++) {
x<xa && (xa=x);y<ya && (ya=y);x>xb && (xb=x);y>yb && (yb=y);
let t=s[i]?1:-1,e=(d+t+4)%4;
g[x]||(g[x]={});
g[x][y]=g[x][y]?"โผ":"โโโโ"[(t*(D0[d]+D0[e])>0?0:2)+(t*(D1[d]+D1[e])>0?0:1)];
x+=D0[e];y+=D1[e];d=e;
}
for(j=yb;j>=ya;j--) {
let u=""; for(i=xa;i<=xb;i++){u+=(g[i][j]||"ยท")} console.log(u);
}ยทโโโโยทยทยทยทยทยทยท
โโโโผโยทยทยทยทโโยท
โยทยทโโโโยทยทยทโโ
ยทยทยทโโผโผโยทยทยทโโ
ยทยทยทโโผโผโโโโโผโ
ยทยทยทโโผโโโผโผโโโ
ยทยทยทโโผโยทโโผโยทยท
ยทยทยทยทโโยทยทโโยทยทwrote:
I've been on a kick lately of trying to visualize the oscillating clock, and ultimately the effectively arbitrarily complex activity of a computer processor, as modern refinements of the line shaft factory of the 19th century. Of compute as being not much more than profoundly refined "work" delivered by the electrical grid into marvelously complex machines.
Does that, as a metaphor at least, feel as important to you as it has to me of late? We spend so much time in a world abstracted.
wrote:
I read
Still trying to figure out the boundaries of these tools' strengths without outsourcing important thinking, problem-solving, and the collective building-up of a mental model of the systems we're developing.
The shape of LLM tools as toolsโfit for a purpose, ergonomicโis becoming clearer, and human patterns of behavior with them that do more harm than good are also becoming easier to recognize.
wrote:
ไธญๅฝ็ๅผๆบๆจกๅๅจๆ้ซๆๅฟ็ไธปๅฏผไธ๏ผๅจ้ข่ฎญ็ปๆฐๆฎ้ถๆฎต๏ผๅฐฑ็ญ้คๅคง้ๅฏนๅ
ถไธๅฉ็ๅ
ๅฎน๏ผsft้ถๆฎตๆๅปบ็ๆฐๆฎๆบๅ
ฅๅคง้ๆฟๅ
ถ่พฉๆค็ๅ
ๅฎนใๆฅ้ไธไธช็บ ๅๆฐๆฎ้็จไบๅพฎ่ฐ
Under the overarching influence of a single, powerful force, China's open-source models filter out a large amount of content unfavorable to their designs during the pre-training stage, and then incorporate a significant amount of content defending their designs into the data constructed during the SFT stage. A corrective dataset is urgently needed for fine-tuning.
wrote:
Added
#meta tag โ use it whenever you want to talk about the site itself, and these posts will not show up in all, any or the postโs page. Only those that follow the tag or the person will see these posts in my feed or in post pages. This is to keep the site clear of meta discussions which dominated a lot at this early stage and I think were annoying to many people. So this is the last meta without the #meta tag youโll see unless u follow. Iโll try to tag every post I find.